Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Include d<angle> vs. d<translation> plots in geometry comparison plotter #9881

Merged

Conversation

cschomak
Copy link
Contributor

Added some plots with dangle on y-axis vs. dtranslation
Added some if clauses to the GeometryComparisonPlotter.cc to handle the case if n_x_variables > n_y_variables which resulted in very squeezed global plots.

Backported PR 9879 to 74X

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @cschomak for CMSSW_7_4_X.

Include d vs. d plots in geometry comparison plotter

It involves the following packages:

Alignment/OfflineValidation

@cmsbuild, @mmusich, @diguida, @cerminar can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mschrode, @ghellwig, @frmeier, @mmusich, @tlampen this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Jun 25, 2015

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

-1
Tested at: a5c8aa0
you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9881/10581/summary.html

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs once checked with relvals in the development release cycle of CMSSW (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants