Expose master_timeout flag on GET _template & HEAD _template
#9688
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
These are master level operation but we currently don't expose this parameter
bleskes
changed the title
master_timeout flag on GET _template & HEAD _templatemaster_timeout flag on GET _template & HEAD _template
bleskes
added
v1.5.0
v2.0.0-beta1
:Core/Infra/REST API
|
LGTM |
bleskes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2015
These are master level operation but we currently don't expose this parameter Closes #9688
karmi
added a commit
to elastic/elasticsearch-ruby
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2015
…"Get Template" APIs Related: elastic/elasticsearch#9688
clintongormley
changed the title
master_timeout flag on GET _template & HEAD _templatemaster_timeout flag on GET _template & HEAD _template
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These are master level operation but we currently don't expose this parameter