Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cluster Health API: Add wait_for_nodes (accepts "N", "<N", ">N", "<=N", and ">=N") #269

Closed
kimchy opened this issue Jul 21, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

Cluster Health API: Add wait_for_nodes (accepts "N", "<N", ">N", "<=N", and ">=N") #269

kimchy opened this issue Jul 21, 2010 · 1 comment
Labels
>enhancement v0.09.0

Comments

@kimchy
Copy link
Member

kimchy commented Jul 21, 2010

No description provided.

@kimchy
Copy link
Member Author

kimchy commented Jul 21, 2010

Cluster Health API: Add wait_for_nodes (accepts "N", "<N", ">N", "<=N", and ">=N"), closed by 48d33ec.

ClaudioMFreitas pushed a commit to ClaudioMFreitas/elasticsearch-1 that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2019
Merge pull request elastic#269 from gingerwizard/master
fce5eac 
Support for plugin diffs + improved testing on minor upgrades + fixes
williamrandolph pushed a commit to williamrandolph/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
@costin
Upgrade to Spark 1.1
c09f74a 
Address breaking change in TaskContext in backwards compatible way (so
that spark 1.0.x can still be used)

fix elastic#269
mindw pushed a commit to mindw/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
Merged in dev/ori/update-IP/2021-10-14 (pull request elastic#269)
84a9de8 
Update Ori's IP address


Approved-by: Can Yildiz
emilykmarx pushed a commit to emilykmarx/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2023
@suyograo
Make it 2.1.0 instead of beta1
008a2fd 
Fixes elastic#269
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
>enhancement v0.09.0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@kimchy