foca / integrity
watch download tarball
public
Forks66Right
Watchers366Right
Description: Don't mind this, go to http://github.com/integrity/integrity
Homepage: http://integrityapp.com
Clone URL: git://github.com/foca/integrity.git

Comments for foca's integrity   feed

technicalpickles commented on foca/integrity Sun Mar 15 13:04:43 -0700 2009
Comment in b96e7b0:

If you have any rational reasons, please give me a shout :) I did notice this adds RubyForge support. That’s something I’m currently working on for the next jeweler release.

This is a nice implementation though. I like it’s simplicity, the fact that the integrity.gemspec has all the files/versions/etc, and it calls out to shell commands to do most of the work.

sr commented on foca/integrity Sat Mar 14 11:39:05 -0700 2009
Comment in b96e7b0:

Mostly for irrational reason: less magic

sprsquish commented on foca/integrity Fri Mar 13 11:38:58 -0700 2009
Comment in b96e7b0:

Just out of curiosity, why did you decide to drop Jeweler?

mislav commented on foca/integrity Mon Feb 16 02:20:22 -0800 2009
Comment in 93b272e:

yaay I love this commit

sr commented on foca/integrity Thu Feb 12 10:23:52 -0800 2009
Comment in e1f2d17:

woops, config.sample.ru needs updating

sr commented on foca/integrity Mon Jan 26 07:30:26 -0800 2009
Comment in cfaca33:

woops :)

Syd commented on foca/integrity Sat Jan 24 22:23:31 -0800 2009
Comment in 7ad11ce:

“still point out that the push url needs credentials.”

ohhhhhh, that explains why mine is broken.

sr commented on foca/integrity Tue Jan 20 15:38:07 -0800 2009
Comment on test/helpers/fixtures.rb L40 in 7721421:

awesome! I actually wanted #generate_attribute

sr commented on foca/integrity Tue Jan 20 15:36:01 -0800 2009
Comment on test/acceptance/api_test.rb L77 in 7721421:

any reason you used this instead of response_body#should have_tag("#previous_builds li", :count => 4) ?

foca commented on foca/integrity Sat Jan 03 12:48:59 -0800 2009
Comment on lib/integrity/project.rb L70 in 5543e32:

This is eeeeeevil. Fortunately you won’t have thousands of builds :)

sr commented on foca/integrity Thu Dec 18 05:58:48 -0800 2008
Comment on test/project_test.rb L223 in 9051399:

#update_attributes do a #save, so you’re loving #tap too much :)

foca commented on foca/integrity Tue Dec 16 05:53:14 -0800 2008
Comment on test/project_test.rb L51 in a28fbaf:

I always think of #tap as “do some side effects here”. Not exactly ideal for a test IMO, specially when the test is inside the “side effects” block.

matthewrudy commented on foca/integrity Sat Dec 13 14:10:53 -0800 2008
Comment on README.markdown L21 in 9cb8908:

I’m sure `gem source add` did work at some point. And I guess at some point `gem source` will stop working. But I like it.

deal!

sr commented on foca/integrity Thu Dec 04 04:45:04 -0800 2008
Comment in 140578e:

@foca I should just stfu and do it but hey my exam is tomorrow: config/config.yml.config needs to be updated

sr commented on foca/integrity Wed Nov 26 04:14:59 -0800 2008
Comment in 2004e1b:

hahah

anildigital commented on foca/integrity Fri Nov 21 23:26:58 -0800 2008
Comment in 88f7e1f:

M-x align-regex => ftw

elliottcable commented on foca/integrity Fri Nov 21 18:22:02 -0800 2008
Comment in dfd589f:

I love omitting parens, pretty much everywhere. Unless that makes things ambiguous, then I usually omit the outermost pair.

nakajima commented on foca/integrity Fri Nov 21 17:35:13 -0800 2008
Comment on bin/integrity L55 in dfd589f:

+!

defunkt commented on foca/integrity Fri Nov 21 15:45:55 -0800 2008
Comment on bin/integrity L55 in dfd589f:

I personally dislike omitting parens for more than a single argument.

elliottcable commented on foca/integrity Fri Nov 21 15:15:37 -0800 2008
Comment in 88f7e1f:

ayayay defunkt. Ye’re right (-: