Change tourism outline color

[jeisenbe]

Related to #3045 "Outline Coordination Meta Issue"
and #3521 "Add Aboriginal Areas"

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• Change tourism color from brown to #660033 - this is currently the tourism=attraction text color

Explanation:
In #3521 it is planned to use brown for boundary=aboriginal_lands (eg American Indian reservations)
Therefore it is necessary to change the color of the outline used for zoos and theme parks.
This has also been desired, so that these tourist areas would be more visible on the map with a color more closely related to retail areas and other points of interest. The proposed change will also unify the color used for these two features with that used for tourism=attraction.

Purple and orange have also been discussed. Purple would work well, but would be more similar to the current administrative boundary rendering. Orange is another option.

Test renderings:

Singapore zoos
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=13/1.3950/103.8424
z17 Before

z17 After

• Attractions within the zoom now are shown in the same color
• I plan a PR to add generic icons (dots) for tourism=attraction
  

z14 Before

• Can compare to military areas here
  
  z14 After
  

z13 Before

• Compare to the international administrative boundary at this level (top of image)
• Could we show zoos/theme parks with slightly smaller way_pixels at this zoom level?
  
  z13 After
  

Universal Studios Singapore

• The boundaries are hard to see in both the before and after, because the area has been (mis)-tagged with leisure=recreation_ground in addition to tourism=theme_park
  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=16/1.2546/103.8293
  z16 before
  
  z16 after
  

z17 before

z17 after

Jurong Bird Park, Singapore

• Near industrial and commercial landuse
  https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=15/1.3205/103.7153
  z15 before
  
  z15 after
  

[matkoniecz]

Could we show zoos/theme parks with slightly smaller way_pixels at this zoom level?

If you think that it is desirable - please open a new issue (if it is not existing already), it will be missed otherwise.

[Tomasz-W]

I prefer orange over violet (see #3521 (comment)). In my opinion it would look more entertainment-like than violet which is currently used (in different shade) for industrial areas.

[kocio-pl]

Violet outline is not used for industrial areas (which BTW use lighter shade of violet anyway), so we reuse colors in a sane way. It also aligns nicely with attractions rendering, which makes it more consistent. Orange looks much lighter, so it could be used for something more "calm" than amusement.

[jeisenbe]

Here are some test images with the other color options. I think the current commit – with #660033 – is the best option. The dark violet option would probably require changing the the administrative border color, and lighter violet or purple would certainly require it.

Orange: #C77400
Zoos z14

z17

Bird Park z15

Universal Studios z16

z17

Dark Violet: #864784
Zoos z14

z17

Bird Park z15

Universal Studios z16

z17

(Thank Telkomsel for the great internet connection today)

[Adamant36]

Id go with violet. Orange just doesn't make sense and violet looks better. Although it could be because of the (what I assume is) wrong park tagging color in the examples. Which go better with violet. Even so, violet seems to fit better with the other colors in general. Orange is better for something more natural, like trails in the woods or something (the one exception being gastronomy).

[matkoniecz]

Violet for me looks too close to administrative boundaries.

[Adamant36]

@matkoniecz, is that an endorsement of orange then?

[kocio-pl]

@matkoniecz For me the difference is visible (this violet has more red shade and different line pattern), but I hope #3553 will make it even more clear soon. Unfortunately it makes the code dependency chain longer and more fragile (first #3553, then #3582 and after that #3521...).

[jeisenbe]

@matkoniecz do you think #660033 will work with the current admin boundaries? I believe this color is sufficiently dissimilar.

…

On Sun, Dec 23, 2018 at 8:32 AM kocio-pl ***@***.***> wrote: @matkoniecz <https://github.com/matkoniecz> For me the difference is visible (this violet has more red shade and different line pattern), but I hope #3553 <#3553> will make it even more clear soon. Unfortunately it makes the code dependency chain longer and more fragile (first #3553 <#3553>, then #3582 <#3582> and after that #3521 <#3521>...). — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3582 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AoxshGbA-oMeCSIfX47x9fv5fAwjL5VRks5u7sEkgaJpZM4Zbrjt> .

[turnsole80]

I'd definitely go with violet over orange.

[jragusa]

Why about adding leisure=water_park (#1490) to the tourism outline ?

[jeisenbe]

We could certainly do that in the next PR.

…

On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 3:45 AM Jérémy Ragusa wrote: Why about adding leisure=water_park (#1490 <#1490>) to the tourism outline?

[kocio-pl]

Thanks! I believe this is different enough from current border rendering and it's better to not hold the #3521 any longer.

[polarbearing]

Would it make sense to move accommodation from the current transport-blue to the new tourism-violet?

[kocio-pl]

I'm afraid it's too close to the shops when using icons.

[polarbearing]

#660033 tourism
#ac39ac shop-icon