@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ I have some issues with this: * There is too much boilerplate in the module, obscuring what you're actually adding. - * Abusing the standard method `include` to not only add instance methods but also do stuff on the class level can be confusing. You could use `exclude` as well, though this is more verbose. To get the `belongs_to`, you'd still need to use module hooks, or put another line of code in the model. + * Abusing the standard method `include` to not only add instance methods but also do stuff on the class level can be confusing. You could use `extend` as well, though this is more verbose. To get the `belongs_to`, you'd still need to use module hooks, or put another line of code in the model. * It looks different from how the code would look if defined in the model: the instance methods are in a different block of code than the class-level stuff – though you could get around this by putting everything in the `class_eval`. README.markdown fa770f15c83d649ea5cbe2c54b197281b6c377f4 Henrik N henrik@nyh.se http://github.com/henrik/augmentations/commit/77fb517b399d95f4f04b9b396d185e9f5dc37a86 77fb517b399d95f4f04b9b396d185e9f5dc37a86 2008-11-19T07:06:44-08:00 2008-11-19T07:06:44-08:00 README: "extend", not "exclude". 1b34b27bdbcd8d6407e3e910c6e576af8d4c5ad3 Henrik N henrik@nyh.se