public
Description: response for lets you decorate your actions respond_to blocks
Homepage: http://blog.ardes.com/response_for
Clone URL: git://github.com/ianwhite/response_for.git
Click here to lend your support to: response_for and make a donation at www.pledgie.com !
name age message
file .gitignore Sat Nov 01 03:25:25 -0700 2008 Availing response_for of new garlic gem [ianwhite]
file CHANGELOG Sun Oct 19 15:14:27 -0700 2008 Updated changelog, tagged 0.2.2 [ianwhite]
file MIT-LICENSE Thu Oct 18 04:00:34 -0700 2007 Initial import of response_for git-svn-id: ht... [ian]
file README.rdoc Mon Sep 22 19:24:32 -0700 2008 Updated README [ianwhite]
file Rakefile Mon Nov 24 22:59:25 -0800 2008 Fixed doc part of cruise task [ianwhite]
file SPECDOC Fri Oct 10 01:15:45 -0700 2008 0.2.1 tag released [ianwhite]
file garlic.rb Tue Apr 07 01:20:48 -0700 2009 Added 2.3 stable branch to garlic build [ianwhite]
file init.rb Tue Feb 03 00:28:13 -0800 2009 Extracted template_exists? stuff into BC module... [ianwhite]
directory lib/ Thu Feb 19 13:18:50 -0800 2009 Remove monkey patch of Reponder, as it's no lon... [ianwhite]
directory spec/ Thu Feb 19 13:26:38 -0800 2009 Make pending 2.3 specs run on earlier versions [ianwhite]
README.rdoc

response_for

response_for (see Ardes::ResponseFor::ClassMethods) allows you to decorate the respond_to block of actions on sublcassed controllers. This works nicely with plugins.ardes.com/doc/resources_controller

Current Version 0.2-stable

As of version 0.2.0, response_for’s functionality can be summed up in one sentence:

"response_for allows you to specify default responses for any action (or before filter) that doesn’t render or redirect"

Actions typically do two things - interact with models, and render a response. The above simple idea allows you to decouple these two functions (where appropriate), which means abstraction of common patterns becomes possible.

NOTE: 0.2-stable has BC-breaking API changes, and is supported only for Rails >= 2.1.x. Version 0.2.0 was released on Sept 14th 2008. You should use 0.1-stable in your existing projects until you have runs your specs and whatnot.

If you want to know more about why I changed the API in 0.2 look at the bottom of this README

Tested for Rails 2.1 and edge

response_for works with 2.1.x and edge. For previous rails versions checkout the 0.1-stable-rails2.0 branch

Example

  class FooController < ApplicationController
    def index
      @foos = Foo.find(:all)
      # default response - render html
    end
  end

  # this controller needs to respond_to fbml on index.
  # Using response_for, we don't need to repeat '@foos = Foo.find(1)'
  class SpecialFooController < FooController
    response_for :index do |format|
      format.fbml { render :inline => turn_into_facebook(@foos) }
    end
  end

Specs and Coverage

  • The SPECDOC lists the specifications
  • Coverage is 100% (C0), and the spec suite is quite comprehensive

RSpec is used for testing, so the tests are in spec/ rather than test/ Do rake —tasks for more details.

Continuous Integration

garlic (at github.com/ianwhite/garlic) is used for CI. To run the CI suite have a look at garlic_example.rb

Why change the API in 0.2?

repsonse_for <= v0.1 intercepted respond_to calls to allow overriding of these by class level declarations. This turns out to have some headaches, such as:

  • If you have some bail-out code in before_filters which uses respond_to, then response_for tries to overwrite this. This meant that I had to write response_for to only kick in once before_filters had run. This made for some funky smelling code.
  • Sometimes your bail out code runs after the before_filters, in a superclass action for example, or just as part of your action (perhaps in another method). The above hack doesn’t work for this case (the before_filters have run). The solution in this case was to use respond_to_without_response_for in any bail out code.
  • Conceptually, overriding code declared in methods, with code declared at the class level, is weird. Here’s an example
      class FooController < SuperclassController
        response_for :index # override Superclass's index respond_to
    
        def index
          respond_to  # one might expect this to override the above, as its declared later - but it wont!
        end
      end
    

So, in 0.2 a much simpler idea is behind response_for - you can declare a default response for an action which will be performed if that that action has not already performed a render or redirect. This means that all of your bail out code written with respond_to will do what it’s supposed to.

Rewriting for 0.2

If you’re upgrading, you just need to convert any actions you want to override from this:

  def index
    @things = Thing.all
    respond_to do |format|
      format.html
      format.xml { render :xml => @things }
    end
  end

to this:

  def index
    @things = Thing.all
  end

  response_for :index fo |format|
    format.html
    format.xml { render :xml => @things }
  end

Previous Versions: 0.1

There is a branch for rails 2.0 users on this release. If you are using rails 2.0, then you want the 0.1-stable-rails2.0 branch. If you are using rails >= 2.1 then use the 0.1-stable branch