Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage track autoscaling not working intially when using port #925

Closed
marc-sturm opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

Coverage track autoscaling not working intially when using port #925

marc-sturm opened this issue Mar 9, 2021 · 4 comments
Milestone

Comments

@marc-sturm
Copy link

Hi Jim,

I found another bug in IGV 2.9.2 on Windows10:
The autoscaling of the coverage track does not work correctly when sending commands via the port.
It works correctly if I load the file manually and jump to the position.

If I start a new session, load a BAM and jump to a heterozygous SNV via the port, it shows this:
grafik

Autoscaling is enabled for the coverage track.
The depth at the position is however not 60.

When I zoom out, it correctly autoscales the coverage track then:
grafik

Best,
Marc

@jrobinso
Copy link
Contributor

noted

@rsettlage
Copy link

rsettlage commented Apr 21, 2021

This behavior is similar for batch mode. Is there a work around? I am trying to script creating png's around variations. I am using version 2.9.4 on Mac and Linux.

@jrobinso jrobinso added this to the 2.9.5 milestone Apr 21, 2021
@jrobinso
Copy link
Contributor

@rsettlage I don't know if there is a workaround or not but this will be fixed in the next point release.

@jrobinso jrobinso modified the milestones: 2.9.5, 2.10 Apr 21, 2021
@jrobinso
Copy link
Contributor

This is fixed and will be released around the end of the month. Meanwhile it will be available in the snapshot build

brainstorm pushed a commit to umccr/igv that referenced this issue Jun 11, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants