manveru / ramaze
watch download tarball
public
Forks34Right
Watchers258Right
Description: Ramaze is a simple, light and modular open-source web application framework written in Ruby.
Homepage: http://ramaze.net
Clone URL: git://github.com/manveru/ramaze.git
Click here to lend your support to: ramaze and make a donation at www.pledgie.com !

Comments for manveru's ramaze   feed

nanodeath commented on manveru/ramaze Mon Apr 13 09:56:11 -0700 2009
Comment in 730b17f:

Wouldn’t this be more obvious with something like Regexp.new.respond_to? :kcode? Or even better, something like Regexp.instance_methods.include? :kcode? Not sure if the latter one is possible, but would be nice.

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Tue Feb 24 09:27:22 -0800 2009
Comment in c87e496:

oops correction, went to look at my source, i removed it’s usage 2 months ago and replaced with my own custom helper. There may still be people out there using this though (?)

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Tue Feb 24 09:15:47 -0800 2009
Comment in c87e496:

UUururghh I’m using that on a live site :(

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Thu Jan 29 09:07:19 -0800 2009
Comment in a6f716b:

good!

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Mon Dec 01 01:18:25 -0800 2008
Comment in 8910f17:

Nice

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Mon Sep 22 05:45:34 -0700 2008
Comment in 85724c1:

oh dear :( i have loads of code that will break if this change is needed

manveru commented on manveru/ramaze Sat Sep 13 16:49:15 -0700 2008
Comment in 85724c1:

I’m trying to find out why this was changed, wrote to ruby-core about it but haven’t received an answer yet.

keita commented on manveru/ramaze Fri Sep 12 06:52:52 -0700 2008
Comment in 85724c1:

Is this because 1.9 trunk’s bug? If so, I am great sorry. need to revert?

manveru commented on manveru/ramaze Mon Aug 11 21:14:40 -0700 2008
Comment in f7e8c33:

In my case i’m using it to decide whether or not to automatically fill the database with fake data before Ramaze.start, if specs are on they should run fast and i don’t need fake data around, so i won’t generate if Global.mode = :spec Hope that explains my thinking.

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Mon Aug 11 10:07:42 -0700 2008
Comment in f7e8c33:

Surely having a separate mode in which specs are run is self defeating. There should never be a differentiation between the code that runs outside of tests and the code that runs within them (baring where absolutely necessary of course).

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Tue Jun 24 01:00:35 -0700 2008
Comment in 734bd65:

Excellent!

tmm1 commented on manveru/ramaze Wed Jun 18 16:42:35 -0700 2008
Comment in 8a0d7e7:

Thanks =)

Pistos commented on manveru/ramaze Tue May 27 19:16:35 -0700 2008
Comment in fb9e620:

I ran some benchmarking which compared controllers that did and did not include the Aspect helper, and actions which did and did not have “before” aspects on them. The results show that there is no conclusive evidence to believe that the aspect helper impacts performance at all. I was the one that recommended the warning be removed, so I will take full responsibility if my conclusions are erroneous.

clivecrous commented on manveru/ramaze Tue May 27 00:27:01 -0700 2008
Comment in fb9e620:

Are the performance issues no longer applicable?