Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Introduced Community Engagement into Society. Added points about weekend surgeries and hustings. #288

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 11, 2015

Conversation

GarethShapiro
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GarethShapiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Many, I would even suspect most, people cannot attend a surgery which runs from 6pm - 7pm on a weeknight.

Hustings are a traditional and, if you consider the televised version Question Time, popular format whereby the public can scrutinise the thoughts and attitudes of those they elect. Ward councillors should be prepared to talk in public regularly about their activities, in the company of their contemporaries. This is also a very efficient way for the public to understand how their own issues and ideas sit relative to others' in the community and also to hold what could be seen as a "Group Surgery" reaching more people in less time.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 4, 2015

👍 nice ideas both

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 4, 2015

Only concern is that currently there's no duty on anyone to run hustings, even during election time, but that is being proposed as an addition in #272 already, so that's fine.

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Mar 4, 2015

Maybe my understanding of "hustings" is off slightly, but the explanation given in the comment above is different from what I expected from the text. I support the general idea, but would like to see it expanded there.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 4, 2015

The electoral commission guidance states: "A hustings event is a meeting where election candidates or
parties debate policies and answer questions from the audience"

http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/105946/sp-hustings-rp-npc-ca.pdf

Does that make sense with what you read/understood?

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Mar 4, 2015

Yes — i.e. that it's in the context of an election. Which isn't what's being proposed here.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 4, 2015

So I read it as that hustings shouldn't be only during election time, and that regular debates with all local parties should be held. Perhaps @GarethShapiro can clarify his meaning.

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Mar 4, 2015

@Floppy — that's what I took the original proposal to be, but the clarification here made it sound like this was more of an event for the elected councillors to talk about what they're doing, face questioning etc

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 4, 2015

Ah, I see, yes. Let's get @GarethShapiro to clarify which he means, and if it's not a general all-party debate thing, then we should change the word "hustings" to something else.

@GarethShapiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

I specifically meant that these public meeting should be all the time, not just in the run up to elections. I've used the wrong term "hunting" which needs to be changed.

Any suggestions?

"public debates"
"public forum"

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Mar 5, 2015

I think one of the key questions is who gets to participate (in terms of presenting / answering questions). Is this for the elected representatives? Or including people who ran as candidates and lost, etc?

@GarethShapiro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Chair

I recently went to one locally which was specifically focussed on green issues. It was chaired by a C class executive of a well known NGO. While clearly in favour of the better green policies he was very otherwise very good at keeping the whole thing on track and the audience engaged.

It way be a bit much to expect good chairpeople (is that a word?) in every community but then again is this not patronising? Not sure but this is probably key to how popular these things might be.

Who are our community elders these days?

Panel

An elected councillor and one member from each of the other parties who lives locally.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

👍

1 similar comment
@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Mar 11, 2015

👍

Floppy added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 11, 2015
Introduced Community Engagement into Society.  Added points about weekend surgeries and hustings.
@Floppy Floppy merged commit 71f355c into openpolitics:gh-pages Mar 11, 2015
@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Feb 8, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Agree 👍 :thumbsup: 1
Abstain :hand: -1
Block 👎 :thumbsdown: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants