From 1f63a52ca26ac2a59591a1b23e8d2c73baff5d6b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Felix S. Klock II" <pnkfelix@pnkfx.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 17:18:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Regression test for rust-lang/rust#56327.

---
 .../issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs | 25 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs

diff --git a/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs b/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000..ff3830d61755a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+// compile-pass
+
+// rust-lang/rust#56327: Some occurrences of `dyn` within a macro are
+// not instances of identifiers, and thus should *not* be caught by the
+// keyword_ident lint.
+//
+// Otherwise, rustfix replaces the type `Box<dyn Drop>` with
+// `Box<r#dyn Drop>`, which is injecting a bug rather than fixing
+// anything.
+
+#![deny(rust_2018_compatibility)]
+
+macro_rules! foo {
+    () => {
+        fn generated_foo() {
+            let _x: Box<dyn Drop>;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
+foo!();
+
+fn main() {
+    generated_foo();
+}