Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use case review: Identifiers #5

Closed
rdeltour opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed

Use case review: Identifiers #5

rdeltour opened this issue Jan 29, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@rdeltour
Copy link
Member

Currently empty.

Evaluation: If I understood correctly this out of scope for PWP.
@rdeltour rdeltour mentioned this issue Jan 29, 2016
Closed
14 tasks
@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Jan 30, 2016

On 29 Jan 2016, at 23:16, Romain Deltour notifications@github.com wrote:

  1. Identifiers https://www.w3.org/dpub/IG/wiki/UseCase_Directory#Identifiers
    Currently empty.

Evaluation: If I understood correctly this out of scope for PWP.

Borderline. I think as a general use case, ie, that a PWP should/must have an identifier the UC is valid. It is just that it is out of scope for W3C (rather than PWP)

@hlflanagan
Copy link
Contributor

We do have some on locators and identifiers. We'll discuss in more detail on a future call.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@iherman @rdeltour @hlflanagan