Skip to content

[MEDIUM] Patch for iputils CVE-2025-47268 #14045

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

aninda-al
Copy link
Contributor

@aninda-al aninda-al commented Jun 19, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

Address CVE-2025-47268

Patch Modified: No
Astrolabe patch reference: iputils/iputils@b41e4a1

Change Log
  • modified: SPECS/iputils/iputils.spec
  • added: SPECS/iputils/CVE-2025-47268.patch
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Associated issues
  • NA
Links to CVEs
Test Methodology
  • local build
  • Patch applies cleanly, please refer the following log snippet
    image

@aninda-al aninda-al marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2025 11:04
@aninda-al aninda-al requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2025 11:04
@realsdx
Copy link
Contributor

realsdx commented Jun 27, 2025

BuddyBuild

Copy link
Contributor

@realsdx realsdx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Patch solves the issue
  • Security tag exists
  • Release bump & Changelog
  • Buddy Build

@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Jul 11, 2025

  • Patch solves the issue
  • Security tag exists
  • Release bump & Changelog
  • Buddy Build

@realsdx Can you please elaborate how did you verify the patch solves the issue?
Also, please compare it with the upstream and mention whether its a clean patch or backported one. If backported, please justify the changes.

@0xba1a 0xba1a requested a review from realsdx July 11, 2025 10:46
@realsdx
Copy link
Contributor

realsdx commented Jul 11, 2025

@0xba1a CVE is for integer overflow vulnerability during RTT time calculations, patch explicitly checks it. It's clean patch, only the long git message and some whitespace removed.

@0xba1a
Copy link
Contributor

0xba1a commented Jul 14, 2025

@0xba1a CVE is for integer overflow vulnerability during RTT time calculations, patch explicitly checks it. It's clean patch, only the long git message and some whitespace removed.

Going ahead considering it as an implicit approval

@0xba1a 0xba1a merged commit 560aff9 into microsoft:main Jul 14, 2025
12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
main PR Destined for main Packaging security
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants