Skip to content

New version: vim.vim.nightly version 9.1.1497 #269659

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

chrisbra
Copy link
Contributor

@chrisbra chrisbra commented Jun 29, 2025

Pull request has been created with WinGet Releaser 🚀

Microsoft Reviewers: Open in CodeFlow

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Service Badge  Service Badge  

@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Validation Pipeline Run WinGetSvc-Validation-65-269659-20250629-1

@wingetbot wingetbot added New-Manifest Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Validation-Completed Validation passed labels Jun 30, 2025
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot enabled auto-merge (squash) June 30, 2025 00:54
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot merged commit e7e4a79 into microsoft:master Jun 30, 2025
1 check passed
@stephengillie stephengillie added the Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR label Jun 30, 2025
@wingetbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Publish pipeline succeeded for this Pull Request. Once you refresh your index, this change should be present.

@chrisbra chrisbra deleted the vim.vim.nightly-9.1.1497-1EC624756768457EBD80A13F09DF908B branch June 30, 2025 23:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Azure-Pipeline-Passed Validation pipeline passed. There may still be manual validation requirements. Moderator-Approved One of the Moderators has reviewed and approved this PR New-Manifest Publish-Pipeline-Succeeded Validation-Completed Validation passed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants