Skip to content

Create main.tf #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Create main.tf #8

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ZIJ
Copy link
Contributor

@ZIJ ZIJ commented May 7, 2025

No description provided.

@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 7, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 7, 2025
Copy link

infrabaseai bot commented May 7, 2025

Potential issues found:

  1. The aws_eip resource for NAT Gateways (resource name nat) uses the deprecated argument vpc = true. This should be replaced with domain = "vpc".
  2. The security group aws_security_group.web allows SSH access (port 22) from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0), which is a security risk. Access should be restricted to known IPs or a bastion host.
  3. The security group aws_security_group.web allows all egress traffic (protocol -1 to 0.0.0.0/0), which is overly permissive. Egress rules should be restricted to only necessary protocols, ports, and destinations.
  4. The EC2 instance aws_instance.app uses a hardcoded key_name ("mycompany-prod"). This should be parameterized using a variable for better flexibility and security.

@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 7, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 7, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 7, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 7, 2025
Copy link

infrabaseai bot commented May 7, 2025

Potential issues found:

  1. The aws_eip resource for NAT Gateways (resource name nat) uses the deprecated argument vpc = true. This should be replaced with domain = "vpc".
  2. The security group aws_security_group.web allows SSH access (port 22) from any IP address (0.0.0.0/0), which is a security risk. Access should be restricted to known IPs or a bastion host.
  3. The security group aws_security_group.web allows all egress traffic (protocol -1 to 0.0.0.0/0), which is overly permissive. Egress rules should be restricted to only necessary protocols, ports, and destinations.
  4. The EC2 instance aws_instance.app uses a hardcoded key_name ("mycompany-prod"). This should be parameterized using a variable for better flexibility and security.

@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 13, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 13, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 13, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 13, 2025
Copy link

infrabaseai bot commented May 13, 2025

Potential issues found:

  1. The terraform.backend.s3.bucket name 'mycompany-tf-state-prod' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using a variable or backend configuration file.
  2. The terraform.backend.s3.key 'networking/us-west-2/terraform.tfstate' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using variables or a more dynamic naming scheme.
  3. The terraform.backend.s3.dynamodb_table name 'tf-state-locks' is hardcoded. Consider using a variable.
  4. The aws_security_group.web allows SSH (port 22) from 0.0.0.0/0, which is a security risk. It's recommended to restrict SSH access to known IP addresses or ranges.
  5. The aws_instance.app uses a hardcoded key_name 'mycompany-prod'. This should be parameterized using a variable.
  6. The aws_instance.app does not explicitly configure EBS volume encryption. While default encryption might be enabled at the account level, it's best practice to define it explicitly for the resource.
  7. The aws_s3_bucket.assets does not explicitly configure server-side encryption. It's recommended to enable it (e.g., using server_side_encryption_configuration).
  8. The aws_s3_bucket.assets is missing block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true to ensure public access is blocked. Also, acl should ideally be set to "private" or removed if relying on bucket ownership controls and block public access settings.
  9. The file contains large, decorative comment headers (e.g., lines 1-3, 12-16, 23-25, etc.) which should be removed or simplified.

@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 13, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 13, 2025
Copy link

infrabaseai bot commented May 13, 2025

Potential issues found:

  1. The terraform.backend.s3.bucket name 'mycompany-tf-state-prod' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using a variable or backend configuration file.
  2. The terraform.backend.s3.key 'networking/us-west-2/terraform.tfstate' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using variables or a more dynamic naming scheme.
  3. The terraform.backend.s3.dynamodb_table name 'tf-state-locks' is hardcoded. Consider using a variable.
  4. The aws_security_group.web allows SSH (port 22) from 0.0.0.0/0, which is a security risk. It's recommended to restrict SSH access to known IP addresses or ranges.
  5. The aws_instance.app uses a hardcoded key_name 'mycompany-prod'. This should be parameterized using a variable.
  6. The aws_instance.app does not explicitly configure EBS volume encryption. While default encryption might be enabled at the account level, it's best practice to define it explicitly for the resource.
  7. The aws_s3_bucket.assets does not explicitly configure server-side encryption. It's recommended to enable it (e.g., using server_side_encryption_configuration).
  8. The aws_s3_bucket.assets is missing block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true to ensure public access is blocked. Also, acl should ideally be set to "private" or removed if relying on bucket ownership controls and block public access settings.
  9. The file contains large, decorative comment headers (e.g., lines 1-3, 12-16, 23-25, etc.) which should be removed or simplified.

@ZIJ ZIJ closed this May 13, 2025
@ZIJ ZIJ reopened this May 13, 2025
Copy link

infrabaseai bot commented May 13, 2025

Potential issues found:

  1. The terraform.backend.s3.bucket name 'mycompany-tf-state-prod' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using a variable or backend configuration file.
  2. The terraform.backend.s3.key 'networking/us-west-2/terraform.tfstate' appears to be hardcoded. Consider using variables or a more dynamic naming scheme.
  3. The terraform.backend.s3.dynamodb_table name 'tf-state-locks' is hardcoded. Consider using a variable.
  4. The aws_security_group.web allows SSH (port 22) from 0.0.0.0/0, which is a security risk. It's recommended to restrict SSH access to known IP addresses or ranges.
  5. The aws_instance.app uses a hardcoded key_name 'mycompany-prod'. This should be parameterized using a variable.
  6. The aws_instance.app does not explicitly configure EBS volume encryption. While default encryption might be enabled at the account level, it's best practice to define it explicitly for the resource.
  7. The aws_s3_bucket.assets does not explicitly configure server-side encryption. It's recommended to enable it (e.g., using server_side_encryption_configuration).
  8. The aws_s3_bucket.assets is missing block_public_acls = true, block_public_policy = true, ignore_public_acls = true, and restrict_public_buckets = true to ensure public access is blocked. Also, acl should ideally be set to "private" or removed if relying on bucket ownership controls and block public access settings.
  9. The file contains large, decorative comment headers (e.g., lines 1-3, 12-16, 23-25, etc.) which should be removed or simplified.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant