Skip to content

[[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] in the example tables is wrong #3578

New issue
New issue
Closed
#3580
Closed
[[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] in the example tables is wrong#3578
#3580
Assignees
nicolo-ribaudo
@nicolo-ribaudo

Description

@nicolo-ribaudo
nicolo-ribaudo
opened on Apr 29, 2025 · edited by nicolo-ribaudo
Member

https://tc39.es/ecma262/#table-module-graph-cycle-async-fields-2

Once an async module transitions to EVALUATED, the [[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] field is set to DONE. It's useful to still show the number in the tables, so maybe we could say "DONE (was 2)"?

@tc39/ecma262-editors Any opinion about "DONE" vs "DONE (was ...)"?

Activity

nicolo-ribaudo
self-assigned this
on Apr 29, 2025
michaelficarra
added
editor callto be discussed in the next editor call
on Apr 29, 2025
bakkot

bakkot commented on Apr 30, 2025

@bakkot
bakkot
on Apr 30, 2025
Contributor

Editors discussed and think just ~done~ is better, since you can scroll up a few tables and see the original number if you particularly want to know.

michaelficarra
removed
editor callto be discussed in the next editor call
on Apr 30, 2025
nicolo-ribaudo
mentioned this on May 1, 2025
ljharb
closed this as completedin #3580on Jun 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

    Development

    Participants

    @michaelficarra@bakkot@nicolo-ribaudo

    Issue actions
      [[AsyncEvaluationOrder]] in the example tables is wrong · Issue #3578 · tc39/ecma262