Fix Files.createTempDir and FileBackedOutputStream under Windows _services_, a rare use case.

Fixes #6634

Relevant to #2686 in that it shows that we would ideally run our Windows testing under both Java 8 *and* a newer version....

RELNOTES=`io`: Fixed `Files.createTempDir` and `FileBackedOutputStream` under [Windows _services_, a rare use case](#6634).
PiperOrigin-RevId: 568604081

Author: cpovirk

android/guava-tests/test/com/google/common/io/FilesCreateTempDirTest.java

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 package com.google.common.io;
 
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_IO_TMPDIR;
+import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_SPECIFICATION_VERSION;
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.OS_NAME;
 import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFilePermission.OWNER_EXECUTE;
@@ -64,6 +65,45 @@ public void testCreateTempDir() throws IOException {
     }
   }
 
+  public void testBogusSystemPropertiesUsername() {
+    if (isAndroid()) {
+      /*
+       * The test calls directly into the "ACL-based filesystem" code, which isn't available under
+       * old versions of Android. Since Android doesn't use that code path, anyway, there's no need
+       * to test it.
+       */
+      return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
+     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
+     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at
+     * least old versions), so we mostly do. This is useful because we don't actually run our CI on
+     * Windows under Java 8, at least as of this writing.
+     *
+     * Under Windows in particular, we want to test that:
+     *
+     * - Under Java 9+, createTempDir() succeeds because it can look up the *real* username, rather
+     * than relying on the one from the system property.
+     *
+     * - Under Java 8, createTempDir() fails because it falls back to the bogus username from the
+     * system property.
+     */
+    boolean isJava8 = JAVA_SPECIFICATION_VERSION.value().equals("1.8");
+
+    String save = System.getProperty("user.name");
+    System.setProperty("user.name", "-this-is-definitely-not-the-username-we-are-running-as//?");
+    try {
+      TempFileCreator.testMakingUserPermissionsFromScratch();
+      assertThat(isJava8).isFalse();
+    } catch (IOException expectedIfJava8) {
+      assertThat(isJava8).isTrue();
+    } finally {
+      System.setProperty("user.name", save);
+    }
+  }
+
   private static boolean isAndroid() {
     return System.getProperty("java.runtime.name", "").contains("Android");
   }

android/guava/src/com/google/common/io/TempFileCreator.java

@@ -16,17 +16,22 @@
 
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_IO_TMPDIR;
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.USER_NAME;
+import static com.google.common.base.Throwables.throwIfUnchecked;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryFlag.DIRECTORY_INHERIT;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryFlag.FILE_INHERIT;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryType.ALLOW;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFilePermissions.asFileAttribute;
+import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;
 
 import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
 import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
+import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
 import com.google.j2objc.annotations.J2ObjCIncompatible;
 import java.io.File;
 import java.io.IOException;
+import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
+import java.lang.reflect.Method;
 import java.nio.file.FileSystems;
 import java.nio.file.Paths;
 import java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntry;
@@ -98,6 +103,20 @@ private static TempFileCreator pickSecureCreator() {
     return new JavaIoCreator();
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates the permissions normally used for Windows filesystems, looking up the user afresh, even
+   * if previous calls have initialized the {@code PermissionSupplier} fields.
+   *
+   * <p>This lets us test the effects of different values of the {@code user.name} system property
+   * without needing a separate VM or classloader.
+   */
+  @IgnoreJRERequirement // used only when Path is available (and only from tests)
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  static void testMakingUserPermissionsFromScratch() throws IOException {
+    // All we're testing is whether it throws.
+    FileAttribute<?> unused = JavaNioCreator.userPermissions().get();
+  }
+
   @IgnoreJRERequirement // used only when Path is available
   private static final class JavaNioCreator extends TempFileCreator {
     @Override
@@ -150,7 +169,7 @@ private static PermissionSupplier userPermissions() {
         UserPrincipal user =
             FileSystems.getDefault()
                 .getUserPrincipalLookupService()
-                .lookupPrincipalByName(USER_NAME.value());
+                .lookupPrincipalByName(getUsername());
         ImmutableList<AclEntry> acl =
             ImmutableList.of(
                 AclEntry.newBuilder()
@@ -179,6 +198,62 @@ public ImmutableList<AclEntry> value() {
         };
       }
     }
+
+    private static String getUsername() {
+      /*
+       * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6634: ProcessHandle has more accurate information,
+       * but that class isn't available under all environments that we support. We use it if
+       * available and fall back if not.
+       */
+      String fromSystemProperty = requireNonNull(USER_NAME.value());
+
+      try {
+        Class<?> processHandleClass = Class.forName("java.lang.ProcessHandle");
+        Class<?> processHandleInfoClass = Class.forName("java.lang.ProcessHandle$Info");
+        Class<?> optionalClass = Class.forName("java.util.Optional");
+        /*
+         * We don't *need* to use reflection to access Optional: It's available on all JDKs we
+         * support, and Android code won't get this far, anyway, because ProcessHandle is
+         * unavailable. But given how much other reflection we're using, we might as well use it
+         * here, too, so that we don't need to also suppress an AndroidApiChecker error.
+         */
+
+        Method currentMethod = processHandleClass.getMethod("current");
+        Method infoMethod = processHandleClass.getMethod("info");
+        Method userMethod = processHandleInfoClass.getMethod("user");
+        Method orElseMethod = optionalClass.getMethod("orElse", Object.class);
+
+        Object current = currentMethod.invoke(null);
+        Object info = infoMethod.invoke(current);
+        Object user = userMethod.invoke(info);
+        return (String) requireNonNull(orElseMethod.invoke(user, fromSystemProperty));
+      } catch (ClassNotFoundException runningUnderAndroidOrJava8) {
+        /*
+         * I'm not sure that we could actually get here for *Android*: I would expect us to enter
+         * the POSIX code path instead. And if we tried this code path, we'd have trouble unless we
+         * were running under a new enough version of Android to support NIO.
+         *
+         * So this is probably just the "Windows Java 8" case. In that case, if we wanted *another*
+         * layer of fallback before consulting the system property, we could try
+         * com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem.
+         *
+         * But for now, we use the value from the system property as our best guess.
+         */
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
+        throwIfUnchecked(e.getCause()); // in case it's an Error or something
+        return fromSystemProperty; // should be impossible
+      } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      } catch (IllegalAccessException shouldBeImpossible) {
+        /*
+         * We don't merge these into `catch (ReflectiveOperationException ...)` or an equivalent
+         * multicatch because ReflectiveOperationException isn't available under Android:
+         * b/124188803
+         */
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      }
+    }
   }
 
   private static final class JavaIoCreator extends TempFileCreator {

guava-tests/test/com/google/common/io/FilesCreateTempDirTest.java

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
 package com.google.common.io;
 
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_IO_TMPDIR;
+import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_SPECIFICATION_VERSION;
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.OS_NAME;
 import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFilePermission.OWNER_EXECUTE;
@@ -64,6 +65,45 @@ public void testCreateTempDir() throws IOException {
     }
   }
 
+  public void testBogusSystemPropertiesUsername() {
+    if (isAndroid()) {
+      /*
+       * The test calls directly into the "ACL-based filesystem" code, which isn't available under
+       * old versions of Android. Since Android doesn't use that code path, anyway, there's no need
+       * to test it.
+       */
+      return;
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
+     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
+     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at
+     * least old versions), so we mostly do. This is useful because we don't actually run our CI on
+     * Windows under Java 8, at least as of this writing.
+     *
+     * Under Windows in particular, we want to test that:
+     *
+     * - Under Java 9+, createTempDir() succeeds because it can look up the *real* username, rather
+     * than relying on the one from the system property.
+     *
+     * - Under Java 8, createTempDir() fails because it falls back to the bogus username from the
+     * system property.
+     */
+    boolean isJava8 = JAVA_SPECIFICATION_VERSION.value().equals("1.8");
+
+    String save = System.getProperty("user.name");
+    System.setProperty("user.name", "-this-is-definitely-not-the-username-we-are-running-as//?");
+    try {
+      TempFileCreator.testMakingUserPermissionsFromScratch();
+      assertThat(isJava8).isFalse();
+    } catch (IOException expectedIfJava8) {
+      assertThat(isJava8).isTrue();
+    } finally {
+      System.setProperty("user.name", save);
+    }
+  }
+
   private static boolean isAndroid() {
     return System.getProperty("java.runtime.name", "").contains("Android");
   }

guava/src/com/google/common/io/TempFileCreator.java

@@ -16,17 +16,22 @@
 
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.JAVA_IO_TMPDIR;
 import static com.google.common.base.StandardSystemProperty.USER_NAME;
+import static com.google.common.base.Throwables.throwIfUnchecked;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryFlag.DIRECTORY_INHERIT;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryFlag.FILE_INHERIT;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntryType.ALLOW;
 import static java.nio.file.attribute.PosixFilePermissions.asFileAttribute;
+import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;
 
 import com.google.common.annotations.GwtIncompatible;
 import com.google.common.annotations.J2ktIncompatible;
+import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
 import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
 import com.google.j2objc.annotations.J2ObjCIncompatible;
 import java.io.File;
 import java.io.IOException;
+import java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException;
+import java.lang.reflect.Method;
 import java.nio.file.FileSystems;
 import java.nio.file.Paths;
 import java.nio.file.attribute.AclEntry;
@@ -98,6 +103,17 @@ private static TempFileCreator pickSecureCreator() {
     return new JavaIoCreator();
   }
 
+  /**
+   * Creates the permissions normally used for Windows filesystems, looking up the user afresh, even
+   * if previous calls have initialized the PermissionSupplier fields.
+   */
+  @IgnoreJRERequirement // used only when Path is available (and only from tests)
+  @VisibleForTesting
+  static void testMakingUserPermissionsFromScratch() throws IOException {
+    // All we're testing is whether it throws.
+    FileAttribute<?> unused = JavaNioCreator.userPermissions().get();
+  }
+
   @IgnoreJRERequirement // used only when Path is available
   private static final class JavaNioCreator extends TempFileCreator {
     @Override
@@ -150,7 +166,7 @@ private static PermissionSupplier userPermissions() {
         UserPrincipal user =
             FileSystems.getDefault()
                 .getUserPrincipalLookupService()
-                .lookupPrincipalByName(USER_NAME.value());
+                .lookupPrincipalByName(getUsername());
         ImmutableList<AclEntry> acl =
             ImmutableList.of(
                 AclEntry.newBuilder()
@@ -179,6 +195,62 @@ public ImmutableList<AclEntry> value() {
         };
       }
     }
+
+    private static String getUsername() {
+      /*
+       * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/6634: ProcessHandle has more accurate information,
+       * but that class isn't available under all environments that we support. We use it if
+       * available and fall back if not.
+       */
+      String fromSystemProperty = requireNonNull(USER_NAME.value());
+
+      try {
+        Class<?> processHandleClass = Class.forName("java.lang.ProcessHandle");
+        Class<?> processHandleInfoClass = Class.forName("java.lang.ProcessHandle$Info");
+        Class<?> optionalClass = Class.forName("java.util.Optional");
+        /*
+         * We don't *need* to use reflection to access Optional: It's available on all JDKs we
+         * support, and Android code won't get this far, anyway, because ProcessHandle is
+         * unavailable. But given how much other reflection we're using, we might as well use it
+         * here, too, so that we don't need to also suppress an AndroidApiChecker error.
+         */
+
+        Method currentMethod = processHandleClass.getMethod("current");
+        Method infoMethod = processHandleClass.getMethod("info");
+        Method userMethod = processHandleInfoClass.getMethod("user");
+        Method orElseMethod = optionalClass.getMethod("orElse", Object.class);
+
+        Object current = currentMethod.invoke(null);
+        Object info = infoMethod.invoke(current);
+        Object user = userMethod.invoke(info);
+        return (String) requireNonNull(orElseMethod.invoke(user, fromSystemProperty));
+      } catch (ClassNotFoundException runningUnderAndroidOrJava8) {
+        /*
+         * I'm not sure that we could actually get here for *Android*: I would expect us to enter
+         * the POSIX code path instead. And if we tried this code path, we'd have trouble unless we
+         * were running under a new enough version of Android to support NIO.
+         *
+         * So this is probably just the "Windows Java 8" case. In that case, if we wanted *another*
+         * layer of fallback before consulting the system property, we could try
+         * com.sun.security.auth.module.NTSystem.
+         *
+         * But for now, we use the value from the system property as our best guess.
+         */
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      } catch (InvocationTargetException e) {
+        throwIfUnchecked(e.getCause()); // in case it's an Error or something
+        return fromSystemProperty; // should be impossible
+      } catch (NoSuchMethodException shouldBeImpossible) {
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      } catch (IllegalAccessException shouldBeImpossible) {
+        /*
+         * We don't merge these into `catch (ReflectiveOperationException ...)` or an equivalent
+         * multicatch because ReflectiveOperationException isn't available under Android:
+         * b/124188803
+         */
+        return fromSystemProperty;
+      }
+    }
   }
 
   private static final class JavaIoCreator extends TempFileCreator {