AI and Machine Learning - Note title is slightly misleading/incorrect

[patrickhlauke]

While I understand that the title was chosen to be short and snappy, "Accessibility of machine learning and generative AI" doesn't quite reflect what the note is about.

Machine learning and GenAI are high level technologies, and there's no intrinsic "accessibility" aspect to them.

What the note tries to cover is how machine learning and GenAI can help generate output - as either a remediation for end users, or as an aid during development - that can help increase the accessibility of content.

So, while less exciting, something more along the lines of "The use of machine learning and generative AI to create accessible content" or similar.

[yatil]

I propose “Some more or less convincing use cases where ‘AI’ can support accessible content somewhat, maybe, sometime”.

[hidde]

I agree with @patrickhlauke's point, his suggestion covers the contents of the Note more precisely and I find it more helpful.

[joshueoconnor]

Hi all - we acknowledge the comment and thank you, and just to let you know we are aware of this, the scope of the document is under active review under Research Questions TF and we expect the scope will be expanded.

When published the FPWD will request further comments on scope.

[joshueoconnor]

Discussed this in RQTF - thank you @patrickhlauke we agree. We will work on the title as we go, and it may go through several iterations.