Treatment of kind
field on JournalEntry is inconsistent
#18872
Labels
severity: low
Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available
status: accepted
This issue has been accepted for implementation
type: bug
A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Milestone
Deployment Type
NetBox Cloud
NetBox Version
v4.2.5
Python Version
3.10
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Behavior
The
kind
field should always be required (AFAICT):Observed Behavior
The
kind
field is not required by either the model's form or its REST API serializer.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: