Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tags - Tagged Objects - Configure Table missing #18877

Closed
the-seppel opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Closed

Tags - Tagged Objects - Configure Table missing #18877

the-seppel opened this issue Mar 12, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application

Comments

@the-seppel
Copy link

NetBox version

v.4.2.5

Feature type

New functionality

Proposed functionality

If you view all objects with a certain tag you can't configure the table view. e.g. custom fileds, location, rack, tenant

Use case

you can filter the tags for your purposes. e.g. you need a list with all objects in a tenant or location. At the moment you can only see ALL objects with a certain tag.

Database changes

I think there is no need for a db change because all information already exist. It's the view which must be extended to filter it.

External dependencies

@the-seppel the-seppel added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application labels Mar 12, 2025
@bctiemann
Copy link
Contributor

This doesn't seem supportable -- the table of tagged objects is heterogeneous and the configuration of the table wouldn't apply uniformly to all the contents.

@bctiemann bctiemann closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 20, 2025
@jeremystretch jeremystretch removed the status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer label Mar 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type: feature Introduction of new functionality to the application
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants