Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

VLANGroupFilterSet site_group field doesn't match VLANGroupFilterForm sitegroup field #18933

Closed
renatoalmeidaoliveira opened this issue Mar 17, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #18947
Closed

VLANGroupFilterSet site_group field doesn't match VLANGroupFilterForm sitegroup field #18933

renatoalmeidaoliveira opened this issue Mar 17, 2025 · 1 comment · Fixed by #18947
Assignees
@renatoalmeidaoliveira
Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Milestone
v4.2.6

Comments

@renatoalmeidaoliveira
Copy link
Collaborator

Deployment Type

Self-hosted

NetBox Version

v4.2.5

Python Version

3.10

Steps to Reproduce

  1. In VLANGroupsListView filter by Site group

Expected Behavior

The queryset filter by site_group

Observed Behavior

The queryset is filtering by sitegroup that doesn't have a FilterSet Field
@renatoalmeidaoliveira renatoalmeidaoliveira added status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application labels Mar 17, 2025
@renatoalmeidaoliveira
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Code reference:

Open
@bctiemann bctiemann added status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available and removed status: needs triage This issue is awaiting triage by a maintainer labels Mar 18, 2025
This was referenced Mar 19, 2025
Merged
Open
@jnovinger jnovinger added this to the v4.2.6 milestone Mar 19, 2025
@jnovinger jnovinger mentioned this issue Mar 21, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@renatoalmeidaoliveira renatoalmeidaoliveira

Labels
severity: low Does not significantly disrupt application functionality, or a workaround is available status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation type: bug A confirmed report of unexpected behavior in the application
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.2.6
3 participants
@jnovinger @bctiemann @renatoalmeidaoliveira