You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It seems that the only way to compute the value and the gradient of some interpolated function at a given point is to call separate methods for each. However, both these calls will look up the same interpolation knots, and duplicate computation when computing weights. Given this, if one does need both the value and gradient simultaneously (which I do), it would be preferable to have a single function that computes both.
I've mentioned this before elsewhere, but worth stating here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
It seems that the only way to compute the value and the gradient of some interpolated function at a given point is to call separate methods for each. However, both these calls will look up the same interpolation knots, and duplicate computation when computing weights. Given this, if one does need both the value and gradient simultaneously (which I do), it would be preferable to have a single function that computes both.
I've mentioned this before elsewhere, but worth stating here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: