feat: add runners to pb protocol #2433
Conversation
Deploying rivet with
|
| Latest commit: |
cdf9857
|
| Status: | 🚫 Build failed. |
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
5 times, most recently
from
d3bc56e to
9e9302b
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-07-fix_swap_status_monitor_dns_resolver_with_native_resolver
branch
from
13d14bb to
35fc915
Compare
graphite-app
bot
changed the base branch from
05-07-fix_swap_status_monitor_dns_resolver_with_native_resolver
to
graphite-base/2433
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
9e9302b to
b4a61a7
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
graphite-base/2433
branch
from
35fc915 to
bb8ccd5
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
3 times, most recently
from
faaaf17 to
542b3c5
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
542b3c5 to
885534d
Compare
Deploying rivet-studio with
|
| Latest commit: |
cdf9857
|
| Status: | 🚫 Build failed. |
Deploying rivet-hub with
|
| Latest commit: |
cdf9857
|
| Status: | 🚫 Build failed. |
![greptile-apps[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/867647?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PR Summary
This PR introduces a major architectural change to the Rivet project by adding runners to the pegboard protocol and removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. The changes consolidate runner management into a more generic protocol while maintaining backward compatibility.
- Removes
isolate-v8-runnerpackage and related JavaScript runtime functionality, suggesting a shift away from V8-based isolation - Adds new
actor2workflow with support for multi-slot runners and improved state management inpackages/edge/services/pegboard/src/workflows/actor2/ - Introduces runner tracking by remaining slots with new key structures in
packages/edge/services/pegboard/src/keys/runner.rs - Refactors container runner to use generic runner terminology and WebSocket-based communication in
packages/edge/infra/client/container-runner/ - Adds subnet configuration and IP management for runners in
pegboard_configure.shwith new variables likeSUBNET_IPV4andSUBNET_IPV6
76 file(s) reviewed, 49 comment(s)
Edit PR Review Bot Settings | Greptile
docker/universal/Dockerfile
Outdated
| @@ -47,10 +47,10 @@ RUN \ | |||
| --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.cache,id=universal-user-cache \ | |||
| --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.npm,id=universal-user-npm \ | |||
| --mount=type=cache,target=/root/.yarn,id=universal-user-yarn \ | |||
| RUSTFLAGS="--cfg tokio_unstable" RIVET_BUILD_HUB=0 cargo build --bin rivet-server --bin rivet-edge-server --bin rivet-guard --bin rivet-client --bin rivet-isolate-v8-runner --bin rivet-container-runner && \ | |||
| RUSTFLAGS="--cfg tokio_unstable" RIVET_BUILD_HUB=0 cargo build --bin rivet-server --bin rivet-edge-server --bin rivet-guard --bin rivet-client --bin rivet-container-runner && \ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: The rivet-isolate-v8-runner binary has been removed from the build command. Verify that this functionality is either no longer needed or has been replaced elsewhere in the codebase.
| http2: { | ||
| protocol: "http", | ||
| internalPort: 8085, | ||
| routing: { | ||
| guard: {}, | ||
| }, | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: HTTP2 port is configured but no tests are implemented to verify HTTP2 functionality
packages/common/hub-embed/build.rs
Outdated
| // Copy dist directory to out_dir | ||
| let dist_path = hub_path.join("dist"); | ||
| fs_extra::dir::copy( | ||
| dist_path.clone(), | ||
| out_dir, | ||
| &fs_extra::dir::CopyOptions::new().content_only(true), | ||
| )?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: This will fail if the dist directory doesn't exist when RIVET_BUILD_HUB is false. The old code created an empty directory in this case, but now it tries to copy a potentially non-existent directory.
| // Copy dist directory to out_dir | |
| let dist_path = hub_path.join("dist"); | |
| fs_extra::dir::copy( | |
| dist_path.clone(), | |
| out_dir, | |
| &fs_extra::dir::CopyOptions::new().content_only(true), | |
| )?; | |
| // Copy dist directory to out_dir if it exists | |
| let dist_path = hub_path.join("dist"); | |
| if dist_path.exists() { | |
| fs_extra::dir::copy( | |
| dist_path.clone(), | |
| out_dir, | |
| &fs_extra::dir::CopyOptions::new().content_only(true), | |
| )?; | |
| } else { | |
| // Create empty directory when dist doesn't exist | |
| fs::create_dir_all(out_dir)? | |
| } |
packages/common/hub-embed/build.rs
Outdated
| println!("cargo:rerun-if-changed={}", hub_path.display()); | ||
| println!("cargo:rerun-if-env-changed=FONTAWESOME_PACKAGE_TOKEN"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: These rerun-if-changed triggers are now outside the build conditional, meaning they'll trigger rebuilds even when RIVET_BUILD_HUB is false.
| let mut create_sub = ctx | ||
| .subscribe::<pegboard::workflows::actor::CreateComplete>(("actor_id", actor_id)) | ||
|
|
||
| if let build::types::BuildAllocationType::None = build.allocation_type { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: Consider extracting common workflow setup code to avoid duplication between allocation type branches
| pub struct RunnerConfig { | ||
| pub image: Image, | ||
| pub root_user_enabled: bool, | ||
| pub resources: Resources, | ||
| pub env: HashableMap<String, String>, | ||
| pub ports: HashableMap<String, Port>, | ||
| pub network_mode: NetworkMode, | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: RunnerConfig duplicates fields from deprecated ActorConfig. Consider reusing the existing types to maintain consistency.
| if let BuildAllocationType::Multi = input.build_allocation_type { | ||
| loop { | ||
| let Some(entry) = stream.try_next().await? else { | ||
| return Ok(None); | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| let old_runner_allocation_key = keys::subspace() | ||
| .unpack::<keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKey>(entry.key()) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?; | ||
|
|
||
| let data = old_runner_allocation_key | ||
| .deserialize(entry.value()) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?; | ||
|
|
||
| // Add read conflict only for this key | ||
| tx.add_conflict_range( | ||
| entry.key(), | ||
| &end_of_key_range(entry.key()), | ||
| ConflictRangeType::Read, | ||
| )?; | ||
|
|
||
| // Clear old entry | ||
| tx.clear(entry.key()); | ||
|
|
||
| let new_remaining_slots = | ||
| old_runner_allocation_key.remaining_slots.saturating_sub(1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Write new allocation key with 1 less slot | ||
| let new_allocation_key = keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKey::new( | ||
| input.image_id, | ||
| new_remaining_slots, | ||
| old_runner_allocation_key.runner_id, | ||
| ); | ||
| tx.set(&keys::subspace().pack(&new_allocation_key), entry.value()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Update runner record | ||
| let remaining_slots_key = | ||
| keys::runner::RemainingSlotsKey::new(old_runner_allocation_key.runner_id); | ||
| tx.set( | ||
| &keys::subspace().pack(&remaining_slots_key), | ||
| &remaining_slots_key | ||
| .serialize(new_remaining_slots) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Insert actor index key | ||
| let client_actor_key = | ||
| keys::client::ActorKey::new(data.client_id, input.actor_id); | ||
| tx.set( | ||
| &keys::subspace().pack(&client_actor_key), | ||
| &client_actor_key | ||
| .serialize(input.generation) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| return Ok(Some(AllocateActorOutput { | ||
| runner_id: old_runner_allocation_key.runner_id, | ||
| new_runner: false, | ||
| client_id: data.client_id, | ||
| client_workflow_id: data.client_workflow_id, | ||
| })); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: The allocation loop for multi-type builds lacks a check for remaining_slots > 0, which could lead to allocating to runners with no capacity
| if let BuildAllocationType::Multi = input.build_allocation_type { | ||
| let remaining_slots = input.build_allocation_total_slots.saturating_sub(1); | ||
| let total_slots = input.build_allocation_total_slots; | ||
|
|
||
| // Insert runner records | ||
| let remaining_slots_key = keys::runner::RemainingSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | ||
| tx.set( | ||
| &keys::subspace().pack(&remaining_slots_key), | ||
| &remaining_slots_key | ||
| .serialize(remaining_slots) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| let total_slots_key = keys::runner::TotalSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | ||
| tx.set( | ||
| &keys::subspace().pack(&total_slots_key), | ||
| &total_slots_key | ||
| .serialize(total_slots) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| // Insert runner index key | ||
| let runner_idx_key = keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKey::new( | ||
| input.image_id, | ||
| remaining_slots, | ||
| runner_id, | ||
| ); | ||
| tx.set( | ||
| &keys::subspace().pack(&runner_idx_key), | ||
| &runner_idx_key | ||
| .serialize(keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKeyData { | ||
| client_id: old_client_allocation_key.client_id, | ||
| client_workflow_id, | ||
| }) | ||
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | ||
| ); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: Runner records are only created when build_allocation_type is Multi, but this creates an inconsistency since Single type builds should also have runner records
| if let BuildAllocationType::Multi = input.build_allocation_type { | |
| let remaining_slots = input.build_allocation_total_slots.saturating_sub(1); | |
| let total_slots = input.build_allocation_total_slots; | |
| // Insert runner records | |
| let remaining_slots_key = keys::runner::RemainingSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&remaining_slots_key), | |
| &remaining_slots_key | |
| .serialize(remaining_slots) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); | |
| let total_slots_key = keys::runner::TotalSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&total_slots_key), | |
| &total_slots_key | |
| .serialize(total_slots) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); | |
| // Insert runner index key | |
| let runner_idx_key = keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKey::new( | |
| input.image_id, | |
| remaining_slots, | |
| runner_id, | |
| ); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&runner_idx_key), | |
| &runner_idx_key | |
| .serialize(keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKeyData { | |
| client_id: old_client_allocation_key.client_id, | |
| client_workflow_id, | |
| }) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| // Insert runner records for all allocation types | |
| let (remaining_slots, total_slots) = match input.build_allocation_type { | |
| BuildAllocationType::Multi => { | |
| (input.build_allocation_total_slots.saturating_sub(1), input.build_allocation_total_slots) | |
| }, | |
| BuildAllocationType::Single => (0, 1), | |
| }; | |
| // Insert runner records | |
| let remaining_slots_key = keys::runner::RemainingSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&remaining_slots_key), | |
| &remaining_slots_key | |
| .serialize(remaining_slots) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); | |
| let total_slots_key = keys::runner::TotalSlotsKey::new(runner_id); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&total_slots_key), | |
| &total_slots_key | |
| .serialize(total_slots) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); | |
| // Insert runner index key | |
| let runner_idx_key = keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKey::new( | |
| input.image_id, | |
| remaining_slots, | |
| runner_id, | |
| ); | |
| tx.set( | |
| &keys::subspace().pack(&runner_idx_key), | |
| &runner_idx_key | |
| .serialize(keys::datacenter::RunnersByRemainingSlotsKeyData { | |
| client_id: old_client_allocation_key.client_id, | |
| client_workflow_id, | |
| }) | |
| .map_err(|x| fdb::FdbBindingError::CustomError(x.into()))?, | |
| ); |
| destroy::clear_ports_and_resources( | ||
| input.actor_id, | ||
| input.image_id, | ||
| Some(build.allocation_type), | ||
| ingress_ports, | ||
| Some(input.runner_id), | ||
| Some(input.client_id), | ||
| Some(input.client_workflow_id), | ||
| selected_resources_memory_mib, | ||
| selected_resources_cpu_millicores, | ||
| &tx, | ||
| ) | ||
| .await | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
logic: clear_ports_and_resources is called with build.allocation_type before checking if build exists, which could cause a panic if build is not found
| destroy::clear_ports_and_resources( | |
| input.actor_id, | |
| input.image_id, | |
| Some(build.allocation_type), | |
| ingress_ports, | |
| Some(input.runner_id), | |
| Some(input.client_id), | |
| Some(input.client_workflow_id), | |
| selected_resources_memory_mib, | |
| selected_resources_cpu_millicores, | |
| &tx, | |
| ) | |
| .await | |
| } | |
| destroy::clear_ports_and_resources( | |
| input.actor_id, | |
| input.image_id, | |
| build.map(|b| b.allocation_type), | |
| ingress_ports, | |
| Some(input.runner_id), | |
| Some(input.client_id), | |
| Some(input.client_workflow_id), | |
| selected_resources_memory_mib, | |
| selected_resources_cpu_millicores, | |
| &tx, | |
| ) | |
| .await | |
| } |
| @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ | |||
| pub mod actor; | |||
| pub mod actor2; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
style: Consider using a more descriptive name like actor_v2 or similar instead of actor2 to better indicate this is a new version
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
885534d to
d0f985a
Compare
MasterPtato
changed the base branch from
graphite-base/2433
to
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
8fad6b0 to
a832749
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
branch
from
f20b30f to
03f6f81
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
branch
from
03f6f81 to
c6943e6
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
a832749 to
0074232
Compare
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the You can disable this status message by setting the Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
branch
from
c6943e6 to
d651a8c
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
0074232 to
c518c13
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
c518c13 to
6c559a1
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
branch
from
d651a8c to
017878a
Compare
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-27-chore_pegboard_add_exit_code_log_from_container_runner
branch
from
017878a to
d6072b5
Compare
MasterPtato
force-pushed
the
05-08-feat_add_runners_to_pb_protocol
branch
from
6c559a1 to
cdf9857
Compare
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Tasks:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
|
Claude finished @MasterPtato's task —— View job PR Review: feat: add runners to pb protocolI've completed a comprehensive review of this major architectural change. This PR introduces significant improvements to the Rivet platform by adding runner support to the pegboard protocol while removing the isolate-v8-runner implementation. Review Checklist:
🏗️ Architecture & DesignStrengths:
Concerns:
🐛 Potential Bugs & IssuesCritical Issues
Security Concerns
🚀 Performance ConsiderationsImprovements:
Potential Issues:
🔒 Security AssessmentPositive:
Concerns:
🧪 Test CoverageMissing Tests:
Existing Tests:
📝 Code Quality IssuesStyle & Maintainability
Error Handling
🔧 RecommendationsImmediate Fixes Required
Architecture Improvements
Performance Optimizations
✅ Overall AssessmentThis PR represents a significant and necessary architectural improvement that consolidates runner management and enables multi-slot allocation. While the core design is sound, several critical bugs and missing error handling need to be addressed before merging. Verdict: Approve with required changes - The architectural direction is correct, but the implementation needs refinement in error handling, test coverage, and bug fixes identified above. Priority Issues to Address:
|
Changes