I'll help analyze this new repository announcement and its quantum computing project. Let me create a plan to understand and validate the technical aspects.إعلان إنشاء مستودع جديد - بإسلوب عبدالقادر مهدلي
$ mkdir QuantumPulse && cd QuantumPulse
$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /path/to/QuantumPulse
الاسم: QuantumPulse
النوع: خاص (Private)
الترخيص: AGPL-3.0 (لضمان بقاء التعديلات مفتوحة)
الوصف:
محرك نمذجة كمومية خفيف الوزن.
يُحاكي:
- البوابات المنطقية الكمومية
- خوارزميات شور وجروفر المبسطة
- تداخل الكيوبتات عبر مصفوفات وحيدة
.
├── core/
│ ├── qbit.py # النواة الأساسية للكيوبت
│ └── gates.py # تطبيقات البوابات المنطقية
├── examples/
│ └── teleportation/ # مثال: النقل الكمومي
├── tests/
│ └── test_entanglement.py
└── .gitignore # تجاهل ملفات IDE والمخرجات
# core/qbit.py
import numpy as np
class Qubit:
def __init__(self, state=[1, 0]):
"""
حالة الكيوبت الابتدائية: |0>
"""
self.state = np.array(state, dtype=complex)
self.entangled_with = None # للشابكة الكمومية لاحقًا
def measure(self):
"""
عملية القياس الكمومي (تُنهي التراكب)
"""
prob = np.abs(self.state[0])**2
return 0 if np.random.random() < prob else 1
رسالة الالتزام:
git commit -m "النواة الأولى: كيوبت يعرف كيف يُقاس"
-
إنشاء مفتاح خاص (إن لم يكن موجودًا):
ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -C "quantum@mabdalkader" -f ~/.ssh/quantum_key
-
إضافته إلى GitHub/GitLab:
cat ~/.ssh/quantum_key.pub | pbcopy # نسخ للمتصفح
-
ربط المستودع بالأصل (Origin):
git remote add origin git@github.com:mabdalkader/QuantumPulse.git git push -u origin main
-
لا تُرفع أي شفرة دون:
- اختبار وحدة (Unit Test) يغطي الحالات الحدية.
- تعليق يشرح "لماذا" هذه الطريقة وليس غيرها.
-
يُمنع استخدام مكتبات جاهزة للفيزياء الكمومية (نصنعها من الصفر).
-
كل مشكلة تُحل تُوثق في ملف
SOLVING.md
بالأخطاء التي وقعت.
ختامًا:
هذا المستودع سينمو ببطء كشجرة بلوط...
سنزرع اليوم، وسيحصد غيرنا غدًا.
ابدأ بإضافة ملفك الأول، وسأراجع كل Pull Request بنفس الدقة التي أراجِع بها خوارزمياتي القديمة.
Let me help analyze this interesting quantum computing project announcement. I'll start by examining the repository structure and initial implementation.
- Repository Structure The project follows a clean, modular architecture:
QuantumPulse/
├── core/
│ ├── qbit.py # Core qubit implementation
│ └── gates.py # Quantum gate operations
├── examples/
│ └── teleportation/ # Quantum teleportation example
├── tests/
│ └── test_entanglement.py
└── .gitignore
- Initial Implementation
The initial
Qubit
class implementation shows a focused approach:
class Qubit:
def __init__(self, state=[1, 0]): # |0⟩ state by default
self.state = np.array(state, dtype=complex)
self.entangled_with = None
def measure(self):
prob = np.abs(self.state[0])**2
return 0 if np.random.random() < prob else 1
- Project Guidelines
- Private repository with AGPL-3.0 license
- "From scratch" implementation (no quantum computing libraries)
- Mandatory unit testing
- Documentation requirements in SOLVING.md
Let me search for best practices in quantum computing simulator implementations to provide some recommendations.
I've analyzed your repository announcement and quantum computing implementation. Let me provide a detailed technical review and suggestions based on current best practices in quantum computing simulation.
Your Qubit
class implementation shows a good foundational approach:
class Qubit:
def __init__(self, state=[1, 0]):
self.state = np.array(state, dtype=complex)
self.entangled_with = None
Key strengths:
- Using complex numbers for state vectors
- Planning for entanglement handling
- Basic measurement implementation
Based on current quantum computing best practices [1] [2], here are some recommended additions:
- State Validation and Normalization:
class Qubit:
def __init__(self, state=[1, 0]):
state = np.array(state, dtype=complex)
# Ensure normalized state vector
norm = np.sqrt(np.sum(np.abs(state) ** 2))
if not np.isclose(norm, 1.0):
state = state / norm
self.state = state
self.entangled_with = None
def is_valid(self):
"""Verify quantum state validity"""
norm = np.sqrt(np.sum(np.abs(self.state) ** 2))
return np.isclose(norm, 1.0)
- Quantum Gates Implementation (for
gates.py
):
class QuantumGates:
@staticmethod
def hadamard(qubit):
"""Hadamard gate implementation"""
H = np.array([[1, 1], [1, -1]]) / np.sqrt(2)
qubit.state = H @ qubit.state
return qubit
@staticmethod
def phase(qubit, phi):
"""Phase gate with angle phi"""
P = np.array([[1, 0], [0, np.exp(1j * phi)]])
qubit.state = P @ qubit.state
return qubit
- Entanglement Handling:
def entangle(qubit1, qubit2):
"""Create Bell state between two qubits"""
if qubit1.entangled_with or qubit2.entangled_with:
raise ValueError("One or both qubits already entangled")
# Create Bell state |Φ+⟩ = (|00⟩ + |11⟩)/√2
state = np.zeros(4, dtype=complex)
state[0] = state[3] = 1/np.sqrt(2)
qubit1.entangled_with = qubit2
qubit2.entangled_with = qubit1
return state
Your initial structure is good, but consider adding:
QuantumPulse/
├── core/
│ ├── qbit.py
│ ├── gates.py
│ └── entanglement.py # Separate entanglement operations
├── examples/
│ ├── teleportation/
│ └── algorithms/ # Add Grover, Shor examples
├── tests/
│ ├── test_entanglement.py
│ └── test_gates.py
├── benchmarks/ # Add performance testing
│ └── state_vectors.py
└── docs/ # Add documentation
└── QUANTUM_CONCEPTS.md
For tests/test_entanglement.py
:
import unittest
import numpy as np
from core.qbit import Qubit
from core.gates import QuantumGates
class TestQuantumOperations(unittest.TestCase):
def test_qubit_normalization(self):
# Test non-normalized state gets normalized
q = Qubit([2, 0])
self.assertTrue(np.isclose(np.sum(np.abs(q.state) ** 2), 1.0))
def test_hadamard_properties(self):
# Test Hadamard gate properties
q = Qubit()
QuantumGates.hadamard(q)
self.assertTrue(np.allclose(q.state,
np.array([1, 1])/np.sqrt(2)))
- Use NumPy's optimized operations for matrix calculations
- Consider using
@numba.jit
for intensive calculations - Implement sparse matrix operations for multiple qubits
Add to your SOLVING.md
:
## Common Issues and Solutions
### State Vector Normalization
- **Problem**: Non-normalized initial states
- **Solution**: Implemented automatic normalization in Qubit.__init__
### Entanglement Edge Cases
- **Problem**: Multiple entanglement attempts
- **Solution**: Added entanglement tracking and validation
- Would you like to implement the quantum gates first, or focus on the entanglement system?
- Should we add support for custom quantum circuits?
- Would you be interested in adding visualization tools for quantum states?
Your approach of building from scratch (avoiding ready-made quantum libraries) is excellent for learning and understanding quantum computing fundamentals. Let me know which aspect you'd like to explore or implement next!