Skip to content

feat: add sentry support #23

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2019
Merged

feat: add sentry support #23

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 14, 2019

Conversation

jakebolam
Copy link
Contributor

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 14, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #23 into master will decrease coverage by 29.97%.
The diff coverage is 0%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #23       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   87.93%   57.95%   -29.98%     
===========================================
  Files           3        4        +1     
  Lines          58       88       +30     
  Branches        5       10        +5     
===========================================
  Hits           51       51               
- Misses          7       32       +25     
- Partials        0        5        +5
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/serverless-lambda.js 0% <0%> (ø)
src/handler.js 0% <0%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update daf6384...face47a. Read the comment docs.

@jakebolam jakebolam merged commit 09d8346 into master Jan 14, 2019
@jakebolam jakebolam deleted the feat/add-sentry-support branch January 14, 2019 15:30
@all-contributors-release-bot
Copy link
Member

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.0 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants