Skip to content

Improve support for esbuild + esm with DD_BUILD_ESM env var #5888

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 18 commits into from
Jun 17, 2025

Conversation

uurien
Copy link
Collaborator

@uurien uurien commented Jun 12, 2025

What does this PR do?

Improves support for esbuild + esm with DD_BUILD_ESM env var, fixing the issue with __dirname and __filename.

Motivation

Plugin Checklist

Additional Notes

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Overall package size

Self size: 9.7 MB
Deduped: 106.2 MB
No deduping: 106.72 MB

Dependency sizes | name | version | self size | total size | |------|---------|-----------|------------| | @datadog/libdatadog | 0.7.0 | 35.02 MB | 35.02 MB | | @datadog/native-appsec | 8.5.2 | 19.33 MB | 19.34 MB | | @datadog/native-iast-taint-tracking | 4.0.0 | 11.72 MB | 11.73 MB | | @datadog/pprof | 5.8.2 | 9.56 MB | 9.93 MB | | @opentelemetry/core | 1.30.1 | 908.66 kB | 7.16 MB | | protobufjs | 7.5.3 | 2.95 MB | 5.6 MB | | @datadog/wasm-js-rewriter | 4.0.1 | 2.85 MB | 3.58 MB | | @datadog/native-metrics | 3.1.1 | 1.02 MB | 1.43 MB | | @opentelemetry/api | 1.8.0 | 1.21 MB | 1.21 MB | | import-in-the-middle | 1.14.0 | 120.58 kB | 841.68 kB | | source-map | 0.7.4 | 226 kB | 226 kB | | opentracing | 0.14.7 | 194.81 kB | 194.81 kB | | lru-cache | 7.18.3 | 133.92 kB | 133.92 kB | | pprof-format | 2.1.0 | 111.69 kB | 111.69 kB | | @datadog/sketches-js | 2.1.1 | 109.9 kB | 109.9 kB | | lodash.sortby | 4.7.0 | 75.76 kB | 75.76 kB | | ignore | 5.3.2 | 53.63 kB | 53.63 kB | | istanbul-lib-coverage | 3.2.2 | 34.37 kB | 34.37 kB | | rfdc | 1.4.1 | 27.15 kB | 27.15 kB | | @isaacs/ttlcache | 1.4.1 | 25.2 kB | 25.2 kB | | dc-polyfill | 0.1.9 | 25.11 kB | 25.11 kB | | tlhunter-sorted-set | 0.1.0 | 24.94 kB | 24.94 kB | | shell-quote | 1.8.2 | 23.54 kB | 23.54 kB | | limiter | 1.1.5 | 23.17 kB | 23.17 kB | | retry | 0.13.1 | 18.85 kB | 18.85 kB | | semifies | 1.0.0 | 15.84 kB | 15.84 kB | | jest-docblock | 29.7.0 | 8.99 kB | 12.76 kB | | crypto-randomuuid | 1.0.0 | 11.18 kB | 11.18 kB | | ttl-set | 1.0.0 | 4.61 kB | 9.69 kB | | mutexify | 1.4.0 | 5.71 kB | 8.74 kB | | path-to-regexp | 0.1.12 | 6.6 kB | 6.6 kB | | koalas | 1.0.2 | 6.47 kB | 6.47 kB | | module-details-from-path | 1.0.4 | 3.96 kB | 3.96 kB |

🤖 This report was automatically generated by heaviest-objects-in-the-universe

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.92%. Comparing base (7e95984) to head (7fd2099).
Report is 11 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5888      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.74%   81.92%   +1.18%     
==========================================
  Files         462      439      -23     
  Lines       19905    19119     -786     
==========================================
- Hits        16073    15664     -409     
+ Misses       3832     3455     -377     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@datadog-datadog-prod-us1
Copy link

datadog-datadog-prod-us1 bot commented Jun 12, 2025

Datadog Report

Branch report: ugaitz/fix-esbuild-esm
Commit report: 6ed330d
Test service: dd-trace-js-integration-tests

✅ 0 Failed, 1259 Passed, 0 Skipped, 22m 11.05s Total Time

@pr-commenter
Copy link

pr-commenter bot commented Jun 13, 2025

Benchmarks

Benchmark execution time: 2025-06-17 15:52:13

Comparing candidate commit 7fd2099 in PR branch ugaitz/fix-esbuild-esm with baseline commit 7e95984 in branch master.

Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 1274 metrics, 49 unstable metrics.

@uurien uurien changed the title Add failing test for esbuild esm Improve support for esbuild + esm with DD_BUILD_ESM env var Jun 13, 2025
@uurien uurien marked this pull request as ready for review June 13, 2025 14:08
@uurien uurien requested a review from a team as a code owner June 13, 2025 14:08
Copy link
Collaborator

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be a good pragmatic approach!
Could you please add a few more test cases for the different options? And the tests should probably not use process.exit() as it would prevent other tests to run.

uurien and others added 4 commits June 16, 2025 15:43
tlhunter
tlhunter previously approved these changes Jun 16, 2025
BridgeAR
BridgeAR previously approved these changes Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Would this potentially also fix an open issue?

@BridgeAR BridgeAR dismissed their stale review June 17, 2025 12:16

Tests failing

@uurien
Copy link
Collaborator Author

uurien commented Jun 17, 2025

Would this potentially also fix an open issue?

I would say no. I can't find any issue related with esbuild build process with ESM, or esbuild app crashing in the issues.

Checking here:
https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-js/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20state%3Aopen%20esbuild

BridgeAR
BridgeAR previously approved these changes Jun 17, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@BridgeAR BridgeAR left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. I just left some suggestions that would make things a bit cleaner in my opinion.

Comment on lines 30 to 32
}).catch((err) => {
console.error(err)
process.exit(1)
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: calling process.exit(1) is mostly an indicator that something is not working as expected.
Here, if we'd change the files to mjs files, we could just use top level await and things should work as expected.

The same applies to the other files.

afterEach(() => {
fs.rmSync('./out.mjs', { force: true })
fs.rmSync('./out.js', { force: true })
fs.rmSync('./basic-test.mjs', { force: true })
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we move the cleanup to the file that runs the test by using a finally block, we'd not have to list them here.
That feels a tad cleaner.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are some tests that are checking the content of the files, like this one: https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-js/pull/5888/files/13e26af2feb6a6d3a14d1677cdbebe29bfd08a07

I don't want to move these checks to the file running the tests, imo the test logic is better here. imho build & run are more than enough to have in separate files.

@BridgeAR BridgeAR enabled auto-merge (squash) June 17, 2025 16:36
@BridgeAR BridgeAR merged commit 65e18d0 into master Jun 17, 2025
618 of 620 checks passed
@BridgeAR BridgeAR deleted the ugaitz/fix-esbuild-esm branch June 17, 2025 16:38
dd-trace-js bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Fix __dirname and __filename in esbuild + esm by adding globals to the banner option.
@dd-trace-js dd-trace-js bot mentioned this pull request Jun 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants