adjust default fusionauth provider details

[alex-fusionauth]

☕️ Reasoning

Adjusting defaults for FusionAuth provider.

🧢 Checklist

• Documentation
• Tests
• Ready to be merged

🎫 Affected issues

📌 Resources

• Security guidelines
• Contributing guidelines
• Code of conduct
• Contributing to Open Source

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
auth-docs	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Jun 27, 2025 0:44am

1 Skipped Deployment

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
next-auth-docs	⬜️ Ignored (Inspect)	Visit Preview		Jun 27, 2025 0:44am

[vercel]

@codercatdev is attempting to deploy a commit to the authjs Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 205 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 38.76%. Comparing base (d7859d4) to head (45d1a87).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/core/src/providers/fusionauth.ts	0.00%	205 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10868      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   39.00%   38.76%   -0.25%     
==========================================
  Files         200      200              
  Lines       32122    32322     +200     
  Branches     1400     1399       -1     
==========================================
  Hits        12529    12529              
- Misses      19593    19793     +200     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[alex-fusionauth]

@ThangHuuVu let me know if there is anything else that needs to be adjusted for this. I don't see a clear way to pass the codecov tests for this change.

[stale]

It looks like this issue did not receive any activity for 60 days. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you think your issue is still relevant, commenting will keep it open. Thanks!

[alex-fusionauth]

@falcowinkler thanks for approving, I actually have a follow up that adds in even more functionality if possible?

#10867

Has more of a breakdown with refresh tokens we would expect.

[falcowinkler]

@alex-fusionauth ok, just add the changes to this PR and we will check it out :)

[alex-fusionauth]

@falcowinkler lmk if you need a fusionauth instance or anything to try this out on.

[alex-fusionauth]

okay @falcowinkler it should be all set, I don't see a way in the provider to also set the callbacks, so I just added it to the details.

[mrjasonroy]

any way we can get this updated and merged into the main branch? Happy to help test or update

[alex-fusionauth]

@falcowinkler I have updated this again to see if we can get merged, can you authorize?