Skip to content

Downgrade zarr requests performance expectations for zarr 3.0.9 #10491

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

TomNicholas
Copy link
Member

@TomNicholas TomNicholas commented Jul 2, 2025

Explained and tracked upstream in zarr-developers/zarr-python#3199

cc @dcherian

TomNicholas and others added 25 commits October 24, 2024 17:48
Co-authored-by: Deepak Cherian <dcherian@users.noreply.github.com>
@TomNicholas TomNicholas enabled auto-merge (squash) July 2, 2025 19:21
@TomNicholas TomNicholas disabled auto-merge July 2, 2025 19:21
@TomNicholas TomNicholas merged commit 8d2e563 into pydata:main Jul 2, 2025
2 of 3 checks passed
@TomNicholas TomNicholas deleted the downgrade_zarr_performance_expectations branch July 2, 2025 19:21
@maxrjones
Copy link
Contributor

OOC why do you use this custom approach rather than LoggingStore?

ianhi added a commit to ianhi/xarray that referenced this pull request Jul 2, 2025
@dcherian
Copy link
Contributor

dcherian commented Jul 2, 2025

This test predates the LoggingStore by many months, and its effectiveness prompted the addition of the counter IIRC

@dcherian
Copy link
Contributor

dcherian commented Jul 2, 2025

We would gladly take a PR to use LoggingStore instead of mocks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants