-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
[Benchmark] fix request loss if "ping" is returned #19535
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.wang@intel.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @sywangyi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses an issue in the benchmark code where streamed responses might be incorrectly parsed or dropped if they contain 'ping' messages, which are sometimes sent by servers to keep the connection alive. The change adds a check to filter out these specific messages, ensuring that only actual data chunks are processed, thereby preventing potential request loss or parsing errors during benchmarking.
Highlights
- Bug Fix: Implemented logic to prevent request loss in streamed responses when 'ping' messages (starting with ':') are received, specifically within the OpenAI chat completions benchmark function.
- Streamed Response Handling: Modified the parsing of streamed data chunks to explicitly check for and skip chunks that appear to be 'ping' messages rather than actual data.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
use VLLM multimodality benchmark to test tgi backend,find request loss issue because “:” is returned and json load fail |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix request loss caused by unhandled "ping" messages in Server-Sent Events (SSE) streams. The change correctly identifies and skips these ping messages (lines starting with a colon) before attempting to parse the chunk as JSON. This should prevent errors and ensure smoother data processing.
My review includes a couple of suggestions to enhance code clarity and maintainability. Additionally, the pull request description is currently a template; please update it with details about the purpose, testing, and results of this change for better context and future reference. No specific style guide was provided, so the feedback adheres to general Python best practices.
Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you update https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/main/vllm/benchmarks/endpoint_request_func.py instead?
We ought to retire some benchmarks script in this folder eventually.
Signed-off-by: Wang, Yi A <yi.a.wang@intel.com>
@aarnphm done for the change,could you revisit the pr? |
Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist
supported_models.md
andexamples
for a new model.Purpose
Test Plan
Test Result
(Optional) Documentation Update