-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.5k
[Bugfix] fix missing 'finish_reason': null in streaming chat #19662
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com>
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @chaunceyjiang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request addresses a bug in the streaming chat completion endpoint where the finish_reason
field was missing from intermediate chunks. By changing how the response model is serialized, the PR ensures that this field is always present, typically as null
, until the final chunk, improving compliance with the expected API output format.
Highlights
- Bugfix: Fixes an issue where the
finish_reason
field was incorrectly omitted from streaming chat completion chunks before the final chunk, instead of being included with anull
value. - API Compliance: Ensures that the streaming chat completion response format aligns more closely with the OpenAI API specification by always including the
finish_reason
field in each chunk.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configureGemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
Test
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an issue where finish_reason: null
might be missing in streaming chat responses. The change modifies the Pydantic serialization behavior in vllm/entrypoints/openai/serving_chat.py
by switching from exclude_none=True
to exclude_unset=True
when calling model_dump_json
for intermediate stream chunks.
This change is correct for ensuring that fields explicitly set to None
(like finish_reason = None
for ongoing choices) are included in the JSON output with a null
value, rather than being omitted. This aligns with typical API behavior where null
is a meaningful state for optional fields.
The modification at line 876 primarily affects intermediate stream chunks, including those that provide continuous usage statistics. While the linked issue #19650 specifically mentions the "final chunk with usage info" (serialized at line 899, which already uses exclude_unset=True
), this PR correctly addresses the finish_reason: null
behavior for other streamed chunks, contributing to overall API consistency.
The change is minimal, targeted, and appears to be a solid fix.
baa6586
to
6be75aa
Compare
Test1
Test2:
You can see that OpenAI standard
|
/cc @maxdebayser @cjackal @aarnphm @DarkLight1337 PTAL. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for fixing!
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com>
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: minpeter <kali2005611@gmail.com>
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Yang Wang <elainewy@meta.com>
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com>
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com>
…oject#19662) Signed-off-by: chaunceyjiang <chaunceyjiang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
FIX #19650