Skip to content

[Minor] Zero-initialize attn output buffer #19784

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 18, 2025
Merged

Conversation

WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon commented Jun 18, 2025

Essential Elements of an Effective PR Description Checklist

  • The purpose of the PR, such as "Fix some issue (link existing issues this PR will resolve)".
  • The test plan, such as providing test command.
  • The test results, such as pasting the results comparison before and after, or e2e results
  • (Optional) The necessary documentation update, such as updating supported_models.md and examples for a new model.

Purpose

Currently, we use torch.empty for initializing the attention output buffer. This could cause a numerical issue in the initial memory profiling run, because all the subsequent operators get uninitialized inputs that could contain NaNs. This PR fixes this by using torch.zeros instead.

Test Plan

Test Result

(Optional) Documentation Update

Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @WoosukKwon, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a potential numerical instability issue within the attention mechanism by ensuring that the output buffer is properly zero-initialized. This change aims to prevent the propagation of uninitialized values, which could lead to NaNs, particularly during memory profiling runs.

Highlights

  • Numerical Stability: Changed the attention output buffer initialization in vllm/attention/layer.py from torch.empty to torch.zeros to prevent potential numerical issues (e.g., NaNs) from uninitialized memory.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR replaces torch.empty with torch.zeros for initializing the attention output buffer in vllm/attention/layer.py. This change mitigates potential numerical issues by ensuring the buffer starts with a clean state, which is especially important during initial memory profiling runs where uninitialized values could lead to incorrect profiling results or NaNs.

@robertgshaw2-redhat
Copy link
Collaborator

was this causing a problem? just curious

@WoosukKwon
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@robertgshaw2-redhat Potentially. If any kernel assumes that the value is non-NaN, this could be problematic.

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon enabled auto-merge (squash) June 18, 2025 04:09
Copy link
Collaborator

@houseroad houseroad left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon merged commit f04d604 into main Jun 18, 2025
82 checks passed
@WoosukKwon WoosukKwon deleted the woosuk/zero-init branch June 18, 2025 06:59
gshtras added a commit to ROCm/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 19, 2025
…ized with .zeros from vllm-project#19784

Signed-off-by: Gregory Shtrasberg <Gregory.Shtrasberg@amd.com>
yeqcharlotte pushed a commit to yeqcharlotte/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
minpeter pushed a commit to minpeter/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: minpeter <kali2005611@gmail.com>
yangw-dev pushed a commit to yangw-dev/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: Yang Wang <elainewy@meta.com>
gmarinho2 pushed a commit to gmarinho2/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
xjpang pushed a commit to xjpang/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
wseaton pushed a commit to wseaton/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 30, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
avigny pushed a commit to avigny/vllm that referenced this pull request Jul 31, 2025
Signed-off-by: Woosuk Kwon <woosuk.kwon@berkeley.edu>
Signed-off-by: avigny <47987522+avigny@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants