Skip to content

[Misc] [ROCm] Prevent surplus tensor reshape #19803

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

zsolt-borbely-htec
Copy link
Contributor

@zsolt-borbely-htec zsolt-borbely-htec commented Jun 18, 2025

In case of ROCm, there is no need to reshape.

Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @zsolt-borbely-htec, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request aims to optimize the attention backend for ROCm environments by eliminating an unnecessary tensor reshape operation. While the stated intent is to prevent a surplus reshape, the provided patch primarily focuses on adjusting the indentation of an existing reshape operation, likely correcting its scope or conditional execution within the codebase.

Highlights

  • Performance Optimization for ROCm: The primary goal of this pull request, as stated in its title and description, is to prevent a surplus tensor reshape operation that is deemed unnecessary when running on ROCm hardware, aiming to improve efficiency and streamline tensor handling.
  • Code Structure Adjustment: The actual change observed in the patch involves a minor indentation adjustment for a query.reshape operation within vllm/v1/attention/backends/triton_attn.py. Specifically, the line query = query.reshape((num_tokens, num_heads, head_size)) on line 379 was moved two spaces further inward (from 12 to 14 spaces). This appears to be a code formatting or scope correction, which, based on the PR description, might be part of a larger conditional logic that prevents the reshape for ROCm.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@mergify mergify bot added rocm Related to AMD ROCm v1 labels Jun 18, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses an unnecessary tensor reshape operation in the Triton attention backend for ROCm platforms when using an fp8 key-value cache. By adjusting the indentation, the query.reshape() call is now conditionally executed only when query quantization (which is skipped on ROCm) has taken place. This ensures the query tensor maintains its correct 3D shape without a redundant reshape on ROCm, while still being correctly processed on other platforms. The change is a good optimization and improves code clarity for this specific path.

Copy link

👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project.

💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels.

Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run fastcheck CI which starts running only a small and essential subset of CI tests to quickly catch errors. You can run other CI tests on top of those by going to your fastcheck build on Buildkite UI (linked in the PR checks section) and unblock them. If you do not have permission to unblock, ping simon-mo or khluu to add you in our Buildkite org.

Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging.

To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add ready label to the PR or enable auto-merge.

🚀

@zsolt-borbely-htec
Copy link
Contributor Author

cc: @gshtras

Copy link
Collaborator

@gshtras gshtras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good catch, thanks for the fix!

@gshtras gshtras added the ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed label Jun 18, 2025
@DarkLight1337 DarkLight1337 merged commit aa20d10 into vllm-project:main Jun 19, 2025
78 checks passed
yeqcharlotte pushed a commit to yeqcharlotte/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 22, 2025
Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com>
minpeter pushed a commit to minpeter/vllm that referenced this pull request Jun 24, 2025
Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: minpeter <kali2005611@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready ONLY add when PR is ready to merge/full CI is needed rocm Related to AMD ROCm v1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants