-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.3k
[Misc] [ROCm] Prevent surplus tensor reshape #19803
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Misc] [ROCm] Prevent surplus tensor reshape #19803
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @zsolt-borbely-htec, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to optimize the attention backend for ROCm environments by eliminating an unnecessary tensor reshape operation. While the stated intent is to prevent a surplus reshape, the provided patch primarily focuses on adjusting the indentation of an existing reshape operation, likely correcting its scope or conditional execution within the codebase.
Highlights
- Performance Optimization for ROCm: The primary goal of this pull request, as stated in its title and description, is to prevent a surplus tensor reshape operation that is deemed unnecessary when running on ROCm hardware, aiming to improve efficiency and streamline tensor handling.
- Code Structure Adjustment: The actual change observed in the patch involves a minor indentation adjustment for a
query.reshape
operation withinvllm/v1/attention/backends/triton_attn.py
. Specifically, the linequery = query.reshape((num_tokens, num_heads, head_size))
on line 379 was moved two spaces further inward (from 12 to 14 spaces). This appears to be a code formatting or scope correction, which, based on the PR description, might be part of a larger conditional logic that prevents the reshape for ROCm.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly addresses an unnecessary tensor reshape operation in the Triton attention backend for ROCm platforms when using an fp8 key-value cache. By adjusting the indentation, the query.reshape()
call is now conditionally executed only when query quantization (which is skipped on ROCm) has taken place. This ensures the query
tensor maintains its correct 3D shape without a redundant reshape on ROCm, while still being correctly processed on other platforms. The change is a good optimization and improves code clarity for this specific path.
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
cc: @gshtras |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch, thanks for the fix!
Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com>
Signed-off-by: Zsolt Borbely <zsolt.borbely@htecgroup.com> Signed-off-by: minpeter <kali2005611@gmail.com>
In case of ROCm, there is no need to reshape.