-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.8k
Fix: Missing newline at end of file #19916
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Missing newline at end of file #19916
Conversation
👋 Hi! Thank you for contributing to the vLLM project. 💬 Join our developer Slack at https://slack.vllm.ai to discuss your PR in #pr-reviews, coordinate on features in #feat- channels, or join special interest groups in #sig- channels. Just a reminder: PRs would not trigger full CI run by default. Instead, it would only run Once the PR is approved and ready to go, your PR reviewer(s) can run CI to test the changes comprehensively before merging. To run CI, PR reviewers can either: Add 🚀 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @PrinceSajjadHussain, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request is titled as a fix for a missing newline character in use_existing_torch.py
, a common file formatting issue. However, the actual changes presented in the patch introduce a duplicate line of code instead of just addressing the newline convention.
Highlights
- Stated Intent: The pull request's stated intent, as per its title and description, is to fix a missing newline character at the end of
use_existing_torch.py
. This is a common convention that can prevent some tools from working correctly. - Actual Changes in Patch: The provided patch, however, shows the addition of a duplicate
print(f"<<< done cleaning {file}")
statement at the end ofuse_existing_torch.py
(on line 22), rather than solely adding a newline character. This appears to be an unintended change or an error in the provided patch content for review.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request aims to fix a missing newline at the end of the use_existing_torch.py
file. The current change successfully adds a newline by appending another print
statement. However, this added statement is a duplicate of an existing one, leading to redundant console output. My review focuses on this duplication and suggests removing the redundant line, as the newline can be ensured by other means or may already be present due to existing print
calls.
@@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ | |||
print(line.strip()) | |||
print(f"<<< done cleaning {file}") | |||
print() | |||
print(f"<<< done cleaning {file}") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This print
statement on line 22 is a duplicate of the one on line 20, leading to the message <<< done cleaning {file}
being printed twice consecutively for each file processed by the loop.
While this addition does ensure a newline at the end of the file (as per the PR title's intent), the duplicated message is likely unintentional and clutters the script's output.
The print()
on line 21 already provides a blank line, which includes a newline character. If the original issue was a missing newline after the print()
on line 21, simply ensuring that line itself correctly terminated with a newline (which print()
does by default in Python) or adding a final blank line to the file would be a cleaner solution without introducing redundant output.
Please consider removing this duplicated print statement.
The file 'use_existing_torch.py' is missing a newline character at the end of the file, which is a common convention and can prevent some tools from working correctly.
Applied fixes:
--- a/use_existing_torch.py
+++ b/use_existing_torch.py
@@ -20,3 +20,4 @@
f.write(line)
else:
print(line.strip())
print()
\ No newline at end of file