Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

simplify internal_itp #1127

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 27, 2025
Merged

Conversation

oscardssmith
Copy link
Member

to match SciML/NonlinearSolve.jl#548 (although this also fixes k2 to 2 since paying for a Floating point pow is expensive.

Do not merge until SciML/NonlinearSolve.jl#548 is merged.

@oscardssmith oscardssmith marked this pull request as draft March 19, 2025 22:26
k1 = T(alg.k1)
k2 = T(alg.k2)
span = abs(right - left)
k1 = T(alg.scaled_k1)/span
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you know if the lack of scaling based on span was intentional here? The NonlinearSolveBase verison already had it.

@oscardssmith oscardssmith marked this pull request as ready for review March 27, 2025 13:57
@oscardssmith oscardssmith changed the title Draft: simplify internal_itp simplify internal_itp Mar 27, 2025
@oscardssmith
Copy link
Member Author

I think this is ready now (but I have started nuking CI from orbit with ForwardDiff PRs so we'll see if CI here ever completes)

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit dd6299d into SciML:master Mar 27, 2025
36 of 43 checks passed
@oscardssmith oscardssmith deleted the os/simplify-itp branch March 27, 2025 16:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants