-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is specific scenario achievable with sequential-workflow-designer #178
Comments
Hello @akiryazov, the flow from the first image could be represented in this way: ![]() I introduced two Basically, this problem would be solved in the same way in some programming languages. if (condition1) {
t1();
readerIteration();
} else if (condition2) {
userData2();
t2();
} else {
if (condition3) {
userData();
} else {
reader();
}
agg();
w1();
gate();
nw();
} |
Many thanks for the answer, @b4rtaz! Is it correct that this can be done only through code and not through the editor? Because I am trying to achieve it with Drag & Drop and I manage to have only 2 if conditions. Sorry if it's there and I just can't find a way :) |
The flow from my screenshot I did in this demo. I used Here (the |
@b4rtaz , many thanks again for the quick response! One last question - is dynamic branching functionality available only in the pro version of the editor? |
You can implement dynamic branches manually as you can see in this example. If you want to use Sequential Workflow Editor then you need the |
Hello!
First I'd like to start that I am not logging an actual issue but rather asking if a specific case is feasible with the library.
I am looking for a new workflow library for my project and encountered sequential-workflow-designer. I liked the design and the functionality which provides but while trying to create PoC using project data, I couldn't do it. I was looking in the documentation and source code as well but didn't find a way.
This is the graph that I have. As you can see the start node has 4 child nodes. If we check reader and user data nodes, we can see that both of them are connected to a single child agg having few more children. We can consider this beign a sub-workflow.
While experimenting with sequential-workflow-designer, I tried 2 approaches. One of them was with using if statements, the other was parallels. However, we can see that both approaches need to connect to one and same child.
Did I miss something or just the library doesn't support such functionality yet? Many thanks in advance!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: