Skip to content

8352963: [REDO] Missing late inline cleanup causes compiler/vectorapi/VectorLogicalOpIdentityTest.java IR failure #24402

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

dafedafe
Copy link
Contributor

@dafedafe dafedafe commented Apr 3, 2025

This PR is a REDO of JDK-8302459 (PR, backout triggered by a failing internal test).

There was an issue with CallGenerator::for_method_handle_call that could delay late inlining by creating a "generic" LateInlineCallGenerator instead of a more specific LateInlineMHCallGenerator:

return CallGenerator::for_late_inline(callee, cg);

While running IGVN this could be misinterpreted as non-MH late-inline
Node* CallStaticJavaNode::Ideal(PhaseGVN* phase, bool can_reshape) {
CallGenerator* cg = generator();
if (can_reshape && cg != nullptr) {
if (cg->is_mh_late_inline()) {

eventually triggering assert(!cg->method()->is_method_handle_intrinsic(), "required");

The fix involves creating a LateInlineMHCallGenerator instead. Here is what changed from the backed out PR:

if (IncrementalInlineMH) {
CallGenerator::for_mh_late_inline(caller, callee, input_not_const);
} else {
CallGenerator::for_late_inline(callee, cg);
}

Testing

Tier 1-4 (windows-x64, linux-x64/aarch64, and macosx-x64/aarch64; release and debug mode)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8352963: [REDO] Missing late inline cleanup causes compiler/vectorapi/VectorLogicalOpIdentityTest.java IR failure (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24402/head:pull/24402
$ git checkout pull/24402

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24402
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24402/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24402

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24402

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24402.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

dafedafe and others added 2 commits March 27, 2025 15:15
…LogicalOpIdentityTest.java IR failure

Co-authored-by: Vladimir Ivanov <vlivanov@openjdk.org>
Reviewed-by: thartmann, vlivanov
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Apr 3, 2025

👋 Welcome back dfenacci! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

@dafedafe This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8352963: [REDO] Missing late inline cleanup causes compiler/vectorapi/VectorLogicalOpIdentityTest.java IR failure

Reviewed-by: vlivanov, thartmann

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 289 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 3, 2025

@dafedafe The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org label Apr 3, 2025
@dafedafe dafedafe marked this pull request as ready for review April 3, 2025 14:06
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Apr 3, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Apr 3, 2025

Webrevs

if (IncrementalInlineMH) {
CallGenerator::for_mh_late_inline(caller, callee, input_not_const);
} else {
CallGenerator::for_late_inline(callee, cg);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would -XX:-IncrementalInlineMH hit the very same assertion? Should we simply require IncrementalInlineMH to delay inlining instead?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@dafedafe dafedafe Apr 7, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would -XX:-IncrementalInlineMH hit the very same assertion?

Indeed! 🤦‍♂️

Should we simply require IncrementalInlineMH to delay inlining instead?

Yes. I removed the non-MH late inline call as well.

Thanks @iwanowww!

Copy link
Contributor

@iwanowww iwanowww left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Apr 7, 2025
Copy link
Member

@TobiHartmann TobiHartmann left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

@dafedafe
Copy link
Contributor Author

dafedafe commented Apr 8, 2025

Thank you for your reviews @iwanowww and @TobiHartmann.

@dafedafe
Copy link
Contributor Author

dafedafe commented Apr 8, 2025

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

Going to push as commit d9f2e69.
Since your change was applied there have been 298 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Apr 8, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Apr 8, 2025

@dafedafe Pushed as commit d9f2e69.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
hotspot-compiler hotspot-compiler-dev@openjdk.org integrated Pull request has been integrated
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants