-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8353600: RISC-V: compiler/vectorization/TestRotateByteAndShortVector.java is failing with Zvbb #24414
Conversation
👋 Welcome back mli! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
@Hamlin-Li This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:
You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 74 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. ➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the |
@Hamlin-Li this pull request can not be integrated into git checkout disable-rotatev-byte-short
git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git master
git merge FETCH_HEAD
# resolve conflicts and follow the instructions given by git merge
git commit -m "Merge master"
git push |
@Hamlin-Li The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:
When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command. |
Webrevs
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks for fixing this!
Thanks for your reviews @RealFYang @luhenry ! |
/integrate |
Going to push as commit cc5e938.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
@Hamlin-Li Pushed as commit cc5e938. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi,
Can you help to review this patch?
Currently, the followign code is considered an RotateLeftV of byte by hotspot, but it's not a real rotate, as the
-shift
will 30, which makesb >> -shift
zero, rather the value we expected.So, the simple fix is to enable RotateLeftV only for int and long, disable it for other types.
A more rational fix should be change C2 to not convert code like(byte) (b << shift | b >> -shift)
to a RotateLeftV node, but it needs more investigation, and I'm not sure if it's feasible to do so, as currently no platform support RotateLeftV for non-int/long types.The vector instruction behaviour is different from java language spec, so seems there is no way to do it for now.
Thanks!
Progress
Issue
Reviewers
Reviewing
Using
git
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24414/head:pull/24414
$ git checkout pull/24414
Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/24414
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/24414/head
Using Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 24414
View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 24414
Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24414.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment