[Bug]: GLM4V model gets lower precision score on TextVQA since vLLM does not process model's position ids correctly.

[FrankiYYF]

Your current environment

vLLM: 0.7.3
Python 3.12.8
transformers: 4.48.2

🐛 Describe the bug

I compared the specific TextVQA result from vLLM with HuggingFace transformer. It turns out that vLLM gives a different answer (both not using sampling postprocess).

# Question: "what is this food place selling? Answer the question using a single word or phrase.”

# huggingface transformer answer
German sausages.

# vLLM transformer
Hot dogs and sausages.

I checked the code glm4v.py and chatglm.py under vllm/model_executor/models and found that vLLM does not preprocess image part in position ids as the source code of GLM4V does.

For example, GLM4V's positon ids for a multimodal input including an image should be [0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 5, 6] where 3 represents the image part; However, vLLM just gives [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9].

I think this the main reason that causes the different answer therefore the lower score on TextVQA, and I hope that vLLM group can fix that.

Before submitting a new issue...

• Make sure you already searched for relevant issues, and asked the chatbot living at the bottom right corner of the documentation page, which can answer lots of frequently asked questions.

[DarkLight1337]

Could you elaborate on where are you checking these position IDs?

[github-actions]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any activity within 90 days. It will be automatically closed if no further activity occurs within 30 days. Leave a comment if you feel this issue should remain open. Thank you!