LabSync

LabSync is an IDA plugin that can be used to partially synchronize IDBs between different users working on reversing the same binaries.

LabSync is intended to be non-intrusive, lightweight, and easy to use for very frequent syncs (think as frequently and easily as you saved your IDB before Undo was a thing).

The leading use case is multiple people reversing the same binary at the same time, and especially for binaries that don't start from a good "baseline" IDB (i.e. no typing information, non-standard formats or architectures), and whose structure keeps changing during the reversing process.

How it works

When enabled, whenever the IDB is saved, LabSync will synchronize some of its data with other reverse engineers using a shared git repo.

LabSync generates a YAML from some of the data stored in your IDB (e.g. names, types, inlined functions, etc.), and when you save the IDB this YAML is also committed to the shared git repo. The repo is then pulled and pushed to sync with others.

In case there were any remote changes since the last time you saved your IDB, they will be fetched during the git pull operation and merged into your local changes.

In case of any merge conflicts, git mergetool will automatically be started for you to resolve them in a convenient textual format, and the sync process will finish afterwards.

The YAML for each IDB is saved under the MD5 of the input file, so LabSync is able to sync it with other reverse engineers no matter their local IDB filename, as long as it originated from the same binary.

Example

We generated an example YAML for the gzip-O3-moutline example from the FunctionInliner repo (source / binary) after inlining all outlined functions, and you can take a look at it here.

An example of conflict resolution can be seen in the following animation (we change some function name and sync, while it was also changed in upstream since our last change):

Motivation

In Cellebrite Labs we often have multiple researchers working at the same time on reversing huge binaries with no symbols or typing information. The structure of some of these also undergos drastic changes during the reversing process (e.g. when FunctionInliner is used).

After reviewing past and existing IDA synchronization solutions, we failed to find a solution that satisfied the following requirements:

Syncing should be very fast and non-intrusive -- either live or as quick and easy as a keypress.
In case of non-live synchronization or live-synchronization supporting offline work (i.e. where conflicts can occur), we want conflict resolution to be clear, intuitive and non-intrusive.
1. Require the least amount of user interaction
2. Be "easy" for a user unfamiliar with IDA/the solution internals
3. Conflict resolution should not be a "must" when you just want to open the IDB to check something
FunctionInliner should be a "first class citizen"
1. IDA's built-in outlined function support (which is trivial to sync) is not sufficient for "deep" reversing, for example because xrefs from outlined chunks to functions/data are not propagated the "parent" functions, and because it makes static analysis of disassembly practically impossible.
2. Non-live syncing of FunctionInliner's effects on the IDB are practically impossible without the solution being "FunctionInliner-aware" (i.e. because if two users inline different functions before syncing, the "clone" segments will most likely collide on the same unused EAs).

We tried to develop a solution based on the Pareto principle -- support the minimum amount of features that will give the maximum amount of assistance to shared reversing work. We also chose to dismiss syncing of features that, even if very helpful, would require a lot of maintenance, or would require going down deep rabbit holes of edge cases. For example, we chose to not sync decompiler comments, because we suspected that it will require exact-same decompilation for all users which is impossible in the general case unless perfect synchronization is achieved for a lot of other features).

We chose to use YAML files to store the data because they're easily editable by humans that will need to understand what's going on and resolve potential conflicts.

We chose to use git as a backend because it's proven to work well for storing text files, handling merges and conflicts and everyone already knows how to use it (or should :) ).

Installing

Install the dependencies listed in requirements.txt where IDA can import them. For example using /path/to/python3/used/by/ida -m pip install -r requirements.txt.
Optionally install FunctionInliner.
Clone this repository and symlink ~/.idapro/plugins/labsync.py to labsync.py in the cloned repo.
Create a new (empty) git repository that will be used for the synchronization data. This repo should be cloned by all of the users that will share their work.
Follow the next section on how to configure LabSync.

Configuring

LabSync expects to find its configuration file under ~/.idapro/cfg/labsync.cfg
Copy the example labsync.cfg from this repository and change repo_path to point to the path where your local clone of the data repository is (i.e. the one from step 4 above).
Make sure that you have merge.tool configured in your git configuration (either globally or locally for the data repo).
1. You can check what it's globally configured to with git config --global merge.tool
2. In case the above is empty, you should configure it e.g. with git config --global merge.tool opendiff
3. You can test your configured merge.tool using this repo.

Usage

To start synchronizing the current IDB to LabSync, use Edit > Plugins > LabSync > Enable.

Afterwards -- just save your IDB regularly in order to synchronize to the repository.

NOTE: when resolving merge conflicts for names/prototypes, make sure that you verify the EAs of the conflicting chunks you're comparing. Git's merge strategy compares the files line-by-line and isn't aware of YAML's syntax, so it may create a conflict when two different adjacent keys have been added to a dictionary such as names or prototypes.

What does it sync?

We currently only sync:

Names given to EAs (e.g. functions, globals)
EAs of functions that have been inlined with functioninliner
Local types (i.e. structures, unions, enums)
Function prototypes

Advanced features

Branching out

You can checkout a different branch on the data repository and push it to the remote data repository, and then your changes will sync only with people that are using the same branch, and won't affect everyone else.

Unless you intend to merge back into the main branch eventually, it's recommended to keep a copy of your IDB before you do the above so it'll be easy to revert once done.

Local type tracking

LabSync generates a UUID for each local type and documents it in a comment above the local type definition written in the YAML. This is used to track renames of local types, so that we don't delete and re-create a local type in case it was renamed remotely (since then all references to it will be destroyed).

When first enabling sync on an IDB whose binary has already been synced in the past, LabSync will try to "adopt" the UUIDs saved in the repo for local types that have the same names as those saved in the repo.

Note that this is a best-effort heuristical approach to reduce the amount of "duplicate" local types that will then have to be replaced manually. However, this heuristic might not be complete, and/or may also lead to false positives (e.g. a logically-different local type with the same name as one saved in the repo will be assigned its UUID).

Please take the above into consideration when reviewing the initial commit merge, and replace false-positive UUIDs with new random ones.

Resetting synchronization

In order to reset the synchronization state of an IDB, you should first disable the synchronization using Edit > Plugins > LabSync > Disable and then use Edit > Plugins > LabSync > Reset.

If LabSync will be enabled afterwards, it'll treat the IDB as "new" when syncing it with the repo, and in case it won't be deleted from git, it'll be merged with the existing repo data.

Mapping segments to a different data file

In some cases it's useful to reverse a binary together with a software library that it uses in the same IDB. In order to support syncing features related to the library between the IDBs of different binaries that use it, you can ask LabSync to sync some segments to separate files.

Note that all of the local types will be synced to all of the associated files, so in case of a conflict involving local types, you may have to resolve it more than once during conflict resolution.

This functionality is mostly intended to be used by IDA loaders, so we don't expose it using UI, but rather using the following API:

from labsync import LabSyncPlugin
LabSyncPlugin.map_segments_to_idb_id(seg_prefix, idb_id)

Where seg_prefix is e.g. libwhatever. and idb_id can technically be any string, but is expected to be the MD5 hash of the libwhatever binary. This will cause LabSync to sync features (e.g. names, prototypes) related to EAs whose segment name starts with <seg_prefix> to <idb_id>.yaml instead of the main YAML file.

Because the library may be loaded to different EAs in different IDBs, the EAs in the library YAML will be relative to the start EA of the first matching segment. If needed, you can override the base EA by providing a base_ea argument to map_segments_to_idb_id.

Known issues

LabSync does not currently do things as creating functions or changing their properties, so this may lead to issues e.g. when syncing inlined functions that don't have the same function end.

Therefore we recommend to start using LabSync on a certain IDB only after it has passed the basic preprocessing it has to go through, in case there is any (e.g. inlining all outlined functions, on applicable IDBs).
When testing LabSync with IDBs created from binaries that had some type information, we found that there are multiple kinds of issues with local types and prototypes autogenerated by IDA, where if you just try to reapply the same local type or prototype that are already there it will already fail.

We tried to solve some of them, e.g. by adding forward declarations of pointed types that were used in function prototypes, but some were more problematic to solve and you will have to solve them manually.

Some kinds of the issues we don't currently resolve:
1. IDA sometimes has issues reapplying prototypes which use namespaced types (e.g. try repplying the type for the _copy function in the gzip-O3-moutline example that we used above). In such cases it's best it's best to tick Don't display this message again when the Bad declaration. See the message window for details. popup shows and ignore it.
2. Syncing of templated types, e.g. from stl (currently we skip dumping them to the YAML and spit a warning instead).
3. In some cases IDA generates VFT structs with the _vtbl_layout suffix instead of _vtbl. On reimport, IDA will yell that constructors/destructors must have the name of the class (even though it allows a _vtbl suffix). You can rename these structs and change the _vtbl_layout suffix to _vtbl in order to work around the issue.
4. We encountered cases where IDA would complain about Type 'id' is already defined where some struct name is id under namespaces. You can rename it to work around the issue.
5. We encountered an issue where IDA misinterprets nested namespaces, e.g. for:
```
struct B::fields {
  int b;
};

struct A {
  B::fields b;
};
```
  It complains that B::A::fields does not exist. This is problematic with the naming scheme used by ida_kernelcache. We're currently investigating a workaround for this issue.

Troubleshooting

Q: I finished resolving a conflict with the mergetool, but IDA still hangs!
A: In case you're using macOS, you have to actually quit the mergetool application for git/IDA to see that it's "done".

Q: Something went wrong during conflict resolution and I just want to go back!
A: Go to your data repository and do git merge --abort

Q: I have a merge conflict on the UUID comment that LabSync added. What should I do?
A: First read the part about Local type tracking above to understand what these UUIDs mean. Essentially, what happened is that both you and upstream have added a type with the same name. If these types are logically different, you can just rename one of them during conflict resolution. If these types are logically same, you should do the same (rename one of them) and then replace all of its usages to the other, delete it, and resync. On older IDA versions there was an automated way to do it, but at least on IDA 8.4 it seems to be gone.

Future work

Auto-resolving of YAML conflicts -- a lot of git conflicts can be resolved by a YAML-aware merger (e.g. when two adjacent functions are renamed, git will conflict but there is no logical conflict)
Sync "data" types -- currently we only sync types for function EAs (i.e. prototypes) and not for "data" EAs
Merging names of functions and their prototypes into one in the YAML (currently a logical conflict in a function name change will result in two git conflicts)
"git blame" tooltip -- see who last named/typed a function to ask them about it
YAML metadata -- add a title/description of the IDB to the YAML

Meta

Authored by Tomer Harpaz of Cellebrite Labs Developed and tested for IDA 8.4 on macOS with Python 3.9.19

License

cellebrite-labs/LabSync

ErrorLooks like something went wrong!

About

Resources

License

Uh oh!

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

Packages 0

Languages

Error
Looks like something went wrong!

Packages