Skip to content

Orchestrator pod logs for Kubernetes #3778

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

bcdurak
Copy link
Contributor

@bcdurak bcdurak commented Jun 25, 2025

Describe changes

Additionally, adds functionality for pipeline runs to feature more than 1 log response.

Pre-requisites

Please ensure you have done the following:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document.
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • I have based my new branch on develop and the open PR is targeting develop. If your branch wasn't based on develop read Contribution guide on rebasing branch to develop.
  • IMPORTANT: I made sure that my changes are reflected properly in the following resources:
    • ZenML Docs
    • Dashboard: Needs to be communicated to the frontend team.
    • Templates: Might need adjustments (that are not reflected in the template tests) in case of non-breaking changes and deprecations.
    • Projects: Depending on the version dependencies, different projects might get affected.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Other (add details above)

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 25, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added internal To filter out internal PRs and issues enhancement New feature or request labels Jun 25, 2025
@bcdurak bcdurak moved this to In Progress in ZenML Roadmap Jun 27, 2025
@bcdurak bcdurak added the planned Planned for the short term label Jun 27, 2025
@bcdurak bcdurak self-assigned this Jun 27, 2025
@bcdurak bcdurak changed the base branch from develop to feature/PRD-940-PRD-1044-stopping-pipelines June 30, 2025 16:04
@bcdurak bcdurak marked this pull request as ready for review June 30, 2025 17:03
@bcdurak bcdurak requested a review from schustmi June 30, 2025 17:03
@bcdurak bcdurak requested a review from schustmi July 2, 2025 13:30
Base automatically changed from feature/PRD-940-PRD-1044-stopping-pipelines to develop July 2, 2025 15:11
@htahir1 htahir1 moved this from In Progress to In Review / Merged in ZenML Roadmap Jul 3, 2025
@bcdurak bcdurak requested a review from schustmi July 3, 2025 12:05
SET source = 'client'
WHERE pipeline_run_id IS NOT NULL AND step_run_id IS NULL
""")
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two statements do not guarantee that all logs now have a source, and therefore the migration might fail later when making that column non-nullable. I would suggest simply using a WHERE source IS NULL in the second one, as there isn't really any other case anyway

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You are right. I think this is theoretically impossible anyhow, because we remove the log entry in case the pipeline or the step gets removed. So, I can not think of a scenario, but I will modify the second one.

Keep in mind, in this case, we can possibly create two entries that are "client-NULL-NULL" and "client-NULL-NULL" in terms of source-pipeline_id-step_id. AFAIK, this should not break the unique constraint between these three values on MySQL or SQLite.

@bcdurak bcdurak requested a review from schustmi July 4, 2025 13:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request internal To filter out internal PRs and issues planned Planned for the short term run-slow-ci
Projects
Status: In Review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants