-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 554
fix: training speed might be incorrect #4806
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: devel
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
📝 Walkthrough""" WalkthroughThe update revises the logic for accumulating and logging training time and average training time in the training workflow. It modifies conditional checks for when to accumulate and report timing, standardizes step indexing for model saving, and refactors variable names and calculation methods for clarity and consistency. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Trainer
participant Logger
loop Training Steps
Trainer->Trainer: Perform training step
alt Should accumulate training time
Trainer->Trainer: Accumulate training time
end
alt Should save model
Trainer->Trainer: Save model/checkpoint using display_step_id
end
alt Should log average training time
Trainer->Logger: Log average training time (refactored logic)
end
end
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 Pylint (3.3.7)deepmd/pt/train/training.pyNo files to lint: exiting. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (29)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
deepmd/pt/train/training.py
(3 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (26)
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-win_amd64
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_arm64
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp311-macosx_x86_64
- GitHub Check: Build wheels for cp310-manylinux_aarch64
- GitHub Check: Build C++ (clang, clang)
- GitHub Check: Build C++ (cuda, cuda)
- GitHub Check: Build C++ (rocm, rocm)
- GitHub Check: Build C++ (cpu, cpu)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (c-cpp)
- GitHub Check: Analyze (python)
- GitHub Check: Test C++ (false)
- GitHub Check: Test C++ (true)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (5, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (4, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (6, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.12)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (3, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (1, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Test Python (2, 3.9)
- GitHub Check: Build C library (2.18, libdeepmd_c.tar.gz)
- GitHub Check: Build C library (2.14, >=2.5.0rc0,<2.15, libdeepmd_c_cu11.tar.gz)
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #4806 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.79% 84.79%
=======================================
Files 698 698
Lines 67821 67826 +5
Branches 3541 3540 -1
=======================================
+ Hits 57508 57513 +5
Misses 9178 9178
Partials 1135 1135 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
fix #4212
Summary by CodeRabbit