Skip to content

Delete s390x and ppc64le helix queues #115161

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025
Merged

Delete s390x and ppc64le helix queues #115161

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2025

Conversation

jkotas
Copy link
Member

@jkotas jkotas commented Apr 29, 2025

These queues are non-functional and there is no plan to fix them.

These queues are non-functional and there is no plan to fix them.
@ghost ghost added the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 29, 2025
@jkotas jkotas marked this pull request as ready for review April 29, 2025 19:25
@Copilot Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings April 29, 2025 19:25
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR removes the helix queue configurations for the s390x and PPC64le architectures since these queues are non-functional and there is no plan to fix them.

  • Removed extra helix test steps from the runtime-community pipeline.
  • Deleted s390x and PPC64le queue setup entries from the libraries pipeline.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
eng/pipelines/runtime-community.yml Removed helix test step definitions.
eng/pipelines/libraries/helix-queues-setup.yml Removed configuration entries for Linux s390x and PPC64le queues.

@jkotas jkotas removed the needs-area-label An area label is needed to ensure this gets routed to the appropriate area owners label Apr 29, 2025
@jkotas
Copy link
Member Author

jkotas commented Apr 29, 2025

Context: #82154 (comment)

Copy link
Contributor

Tagging subscribers to this area: @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure
See info in area-owners.md if you want to be subscribed.

@jkotas jkotas requested a review from leecow April 29, 2025 19:26
@steveisok steveisok self-requested a review April 29, 2025 19:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants