-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
imapserver: add ID capability #693
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: v2
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
imapserver/capability.go
Outdated
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ func (c *Conn) availableCaps() []imap.Cap { | |||
imap.CapMove, | |||
imap.CapStatusSize, | |||
imap.CapBinary, | |||
imap.CapChildren, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could CHILDREN be submitted independently in a separate PR? That way, it can be merged right away.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
moved children to own PR
What is the motivation for adding ID? I find this extension to be harmful in general, because it's privacy-intrusive and enables both sides to write workarounds instead of proper fixes for bugs and non-standard behavior. |
It's for debugging and client support only. Often they have multiple clients connecting so knowing which client they use for which connection helps trace their possible issues. It's also helpful to know which IP / which client so they can have a simple security audit. I don't think the worry for privacy belongs here - the trust is assumed on IMAP service between client and server by definition. |
These simple capabilities are not depending on go-imap and can be made available?