-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 123
fix: fix several check error introduced by old code #565
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes primarily involve reorganizing import statements for clarity and adding Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)No sequence diagram generated as the changes are limited to import reordering, type annotations, and minor error handling adjustments without significant control flow modifications. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (6)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ def __fetch_issues_from_api(self) -> List[PrometheusAlert]: | |||
logging.info(f"Filtering alerts by {self.label_filter}") | |||
|
|||
if self.username is not None or self.password is not None: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we check both var are not None? so that we don't have to add type ignore
but not sure if an empty password and a valid name work.
These check failures are annoying. They only appear only when there's new check errors in the code, which brings extra effort to distinguish which checks are really brought the new code.