Skip to content

feat: Add UFS support for J784S4 and J742S2 EVM #332

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

uditkumarti
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Collaborator

@praneethbajjuri praneethbajjuri left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add a short commit msg

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

Please try addressing the vale comments. You may ignore the ones about abbreviation definitions.

@uditkumarti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Please try addressing the vale comments. You may ignore the ones about abbreviation definitions.

vale review said tick
vale / vale (pull_request)Successful in 30s

is something else , I am missing

J784S4 and J742S2 EVM support UFS, so add in doc.

Signed-off-by: Udit Kumar <u-kumar1@ti.com>
@uditkumarti uditkumarti force-pushed the ufs_support_j784s4 branch from 67a58b8 to bfafd02 Compare July 7, 2025 13:48
@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

The vale workflow is non-blocking. It only fails if there are so many warnings that it breaks the Github API comment limits. It will still leave comments over in the review section. Those should still be addressed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants