Skip to content

Does a new library need to be backwards compatible? #28

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
mingness opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Does a new library need to be backwards compatible? #28

mingness opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@mingness
Copy link
Collaborator

mingness commented Aug 2, 2024

As I understand, Processing 4 was built with Java 17.
Previous templates declare a sourceCompatibility of Java 8.
The current template is using the recommended toolchain to define Java 17, which automatically sets the source and target compatibility to the same version.

@SableRaf
Copy link
Collaborator

SableRaf commented Aug 2, 2024

It's ok to make this template compatible with Processing 4 and newer versions. The instructions and tools for creating libraries for Processing 3 and earlier will still available for anyone who needs them.

@mingness
Copy link
Collaborator Author

mingness commented Aug 3, 2024

Thanks! I'll close this issue then.

@mingness mingness closed this as completed Aug 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants