[lld] Use llvm::count_if (NFC)

[kazutakahirata]

No description provided.

[llvmbot]

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld

@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-wasm

Author: Kazu Hirata (kazutakahirata)

Changes

---

Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141519.diff

1 Files Affected:

• (modified) lld/wasm/InputChunks.cpp (+3-3)

diff --git a/lld/wasm/InputChunks.cpp b/lld/wasm/InputChunks.cpp
index ffab83e636392..855589353e4f6 100644
--- a/lld/wasm/InputChunks.cpp
+++ b/lld/wasm/InputChunks.cpp
@@ -174,9 +174,9 @@ static bool relocIsLive(const WasmRelocation &rel, ObjFile *file) {
 }
 
 size_t InputChunk::getNumLiveRelocations() const {
-  return std::count_if(
-      relocations.begin(), relocations.end(),
-      [this](const WasmRelocation &rel) { return relocIsLive(rel, file); });
+  return llvm::count_if(relocations, [this](const WasmRelocation &rel) {
+    return relocIsLive(rel, file);
+  });
 }
 
 // Copy relocation entries to a given output stream.

[sbc100]

Can you say in the PR description why the llvm one is preferable?

[sbc100]

Can you say in the PR description why the llvm one is preferable?

@kazutakahirata, did you see this comment? It might seem obvious to some (you) but I think some context for the change would still be good.

[kazutakahirata]

Can you say in the PR description why the llvm one is preferable?

@kazutakahirata, did you see this comment? It might seem obvious to some (you) but I think some context for the change would still be good.

@sbc100 Acknowledged.