-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
[AMDGPU][GlobalISel] Fix G_UNMERGE_VALUES combine #141812
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-globalisel @llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-amdgpu Author: Maksim Shelegov (mshelego) ChangesFixes #139791. When trying to combine two G_UNMERGE_VALUES with a COPY between them, Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/141812.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizationArtifactCombiner.h b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizationArtifactCombiner.h
index 3712a7fa06d9a..676b69e04c34e 100644
--- a/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizationArtifactCombiner.h
+++ b/llvm/include/llvm/CodeGen/GlobalISel/LegalizationArtifactCombiner.h
@@ -1064,13 +1064,17 @@ class LegalizationArtifactCombiner {
GISelChangeObserver &Observer) {
unsigned NumDefs = MI.getNumDefs();
Register SrcReg = MI.getSourceReg();
- MachineInstr *SrcDef = getDefIgnoringCopies(SrcReg, MRI);
+ std::optional<DefinitionAndSourceRegister> DefSrcReg =
+ getDefSrcRegIgnoringCopies(SrcReg, MRI);
+ if (!DefSrcReg)
+ return false;
+ MachineInstr *SrcDef = DefSrcReg->MI;
if (!SrcDef)
return false;
LLT OpTy = MRI.getType(SrcReg);
LLT DestTy = MRI.getType(MI.getReg(0));
- unsigned SrcDefIdx = getDefIndex(*SrcDef, SrcReg);
+ unsigned SrcDefIdx = getDefIndex(*SrcDef, DefSrcReg->Reg);
Builder.setInstrAndDebugLoc(MI);
diff --git a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/GlobalISel/legalize-unmerge-values.mir b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/GlobalISel/legalize-unmerge-values.mir
index c231aa8334d45..ce50040b2e726 100644
--- a/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/GlobalISel/legalize-unmerge-values.mir
+++ b/llvm/test/CodeGen/AMDGPU/GlobalISel/legalize-unmerge-values.mir
@@ -1090,3 +1090,20 @@ body: |
$vgpr9_vgpr10_vgpr11 = COPY %8
...
+
+---
+name: test_unmerge_through_copy
+body: |
+ bb.0:
+ liveins: $vgpr0
+
+ ; CHECK-LABEL: name: test_unmerge_through_copy
+ ; CHECK: liveins: $vgpr0
+ ; CHECK-NEXT: {{ $}}
+ %0:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
+ %1:_(s16), %2:_(s16) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES %0:_(s32)
+ %3:_(s16) = COPY %1:_(s16)
+ %4:_(s8), %5:_(s8) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES %3:_(s16)
+ %6:_(s32) = G_ZEXT %4:_(s8)
+ $vgpr0 = COPY %6:_(s32)
+...
|
62f6214
to
9167ec6
Compare
Fixes llvm#139791. When trying to combine two G_UNMERGE_VALUES with a COPY between them, a crash occurs in tryCombineUnmergeValues() because getDefIndex() tries to find the index of the original source register in the def found by getDefIgnoringCopies(). In the case of a COPY in between, this register is not present in the def, only in the COPY.
9167ec6
to
92c4ecd
Compare
@arsenm could you please review? |
Fixes #139791.
When trying to combine two G_UNMERGE_VALUES with a COPY between them,
a crash occurs in tryCombineUnmergeValues() because getDefIndex() tries
to find the index of the original source register in the def found by
getDefIgnoringCopies(). In the case of a COPY in between, this register
is not present in the def, only in the COPY.