Skip to content

docs: shorten the gem summary #687

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2025
Merged

docs: shorten the gem summary #687

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 30, 2025

Conversation

joshuap
Copy link
Member

@joshuap joshuap commented Apr 30, 2025

RubyGems is truncating the new gem summary in search results. This will look better:

CleanShot 2025-04-30 at 11 02 30@2x

Release-As: 5.27.4

RubyGems is truncating the new gem summary in search results. This will look better.

Release-As: 5.27.4
@joshuap joshuap requested review from stympy and Copilot April 30, 2025 18:05
Copy link

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR shortens the gem summary in the gemspec to improve how it appears in RubyGems search results.

  • Changed the gem summary from a long descriptive sentence to a concise version
  • Aims to improve visual appearance and readability in search listings
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

honeybadger.gemspec:7

  • [nitpick] While the new summary is more concise, consider verifying that it continues to convey the essential features of the gem without becoming too vague.
s.summary     = 'Full-stack error tracking, performance monitoring, logging, and more.'

@joshuap
Copy link
Member Author

joshuap commented Apr 30, 2025

This is how the new description looks:

CleanShot 2025-04-30 at 11 06 00@2x

@joshuap joshuap changed the title Shorten the gem summary docs: shorten the gem summary Apr 30, 2025
@joshuap joshuap merged commit 3caacd1 into master Apr 30, 2025
85 of 86 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants