-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 615
✨ Add all ManagedMachineAMITypes supported by AWS API #5540
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ Add all ManagedMachineAMITypes supported by AWS API #5540
Conversation
Welcome @afarbos! |
Hi @afarbos. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
63aae2e
to
054ff36
Compare
/ok-to-test |
054ff36
to
b3b83d9
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-aws-e2e-eks |
@@ -129,7 +159,7 @@ type AWSManagedMachinePoolSpec struct { | |||
AMIVersion *string `json:"amiVersion,omitempty"` | |||
|
|||
// AMIType defines the AMI type | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:Enum:=AL2_x86_64;AL2_x86_64_GPU;AL2_ARM_64;AL2023_x86_64_STANDARD;AL2023_ARM_64_STANDARD;CUSTOM | |||
// +kubebuilder:validation:Enum:=AL2_x86_64;AL2_x86_64_GPU;AL2_ARM_64;CUSTOM;BOTTLEROCKET_ARM_64;BOTTLEROCKET_x86_64;BOTTLEROCKET_ARM_64_FIPS;BOTTLEROCKET_x86_64_FIPS;BOTTLEROCKET_ARM_64_NVIDIA;BOTTLEROCKET_x86_64_NVIDIA;WINDOWS_CORE_2019_x86_64;WINDOWS_FULL_2019_x86_64;WINDOWS_CORE_2022_x86_64;WINDOWS_FULL_2022_x86_64;AL2023_x86_64_STANDARD;AL2023_ARM_64_STANDARD;AL2023_x86_64_NEURON;AL2023_x86_64_NVIDIA;AL2023_ARM_64_NVIDIA |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are we planning to drop support for "CUSTOM"? Currently its mandatory while using LaunchTemplate with ami-id.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't understand this question. The line you are commenting on include CUSTOM
so the answer is no. Can you explain more in details what you are referring to?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oops, I overlooked that part. Please ignore
/lgtm Mergin soon unless there are more concerns (@AmitSahastra in case you want to clarify the comment thread). |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 5d2da98c79c4165365248393cdafb17ec599bc6b
|
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AndiDog The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
/kind api-change
What this PR does / why we need it:
Heavily inspired from #5472
Adding support for ALL EKS Managed Node Group AMIs currently supported in order.
List originates from CreateNodeGroup API docs.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #2009 by adding support for BottleRocket
Special notes for your reviewer:
Checklist:
Release note: